Anti-Kopa Signature
I ORIGINALLY published this at DeviantARt as BratPrinceFan but had to delete it, now this is most originally on Fanpop under my name BenDaImmortal. If you use this please credit me as BenDaImmortal from Fanpop. Thanks!
I tried to make it look a little like Kopa was peeking into the movie universe from the book universe, through an opening with a huge forbidden sign to cover it. xD
Feel free to use as long as you don't alter or edit this in any way, and as long as you credit me properly while using this.
FACTS RELATED TO THIS GRAPHIC:
1.) Kopa's books were not written by the film makers.
2.) The film makers called that cub FLUFFY and not Kopa. They did not even menrion a gender to it.
3.) The sequel movie's production used the genderless FLUFFY for baby KIARA in the film's official trailer. Blending the cub and Kiara into one in essence.
4.) An animator has condirmed that the cub from the first film IS Kiara. Here: http://www.lionking.org/sequels/TLK2/DA-Oz-02.jpg
----> Kopa never existed in the movie universe.
// The Lion King, Fluffy, Kiara and Kopa belong to The Walt Disney Company. The art/graphic is mine.
I tried to make it look a little like Kopa was peeking into the movie universe from the book universe, through an opening with a huge forbidden sign to cover it. xD
Feel free to use as long as you don't alter or edit this in any way, and as long as you credit me properly while using this.
FACTS RELATED TO THIS GRAPHIC:
1.) Kopa's books were not written by the film makers.
2.) The film makers called that cub FLUFFY and not Kopa. They did not even menrion a gender to it.
3.) The sequel movie's production used the genderless FLUFFY for baby KIARA in the film's official trailer. Blending the cub and Kiara into one in essence.
4.) An animator has condirmed that the cub from the first film IS Kiara. Here: http://www.lionking.org/sequels/TLK2/DA-Oz-02.jpg
----> Kopa never existed in the movie universe.
// The Lion King, Fluffy, Kiara and Kopa belong to The Walt Disney Company. The art/graphic is mine.
 Previous |
Return to Kieran's gallery |
This image was created by Kieran and shouldn't be used without permission!
Please respect the artists!
Please respect the artists!
3367 visits
Report this image
Comments
opa
Sorry but the facts prove against that. See the link in the description box. It takes you to a magazine article where the sequel's creator says that Fluffy is Kiara.
opa
L98
L98
Sure you can as long as you credit my DeviantArt name (BratPrinceFan) as its maker and mark it below or above the signature pic while using it, so that people will know who made it.
L98
Wolf
The books were not written by anyone at Disney so it doesn't matter at all what the books mention and thus Kopa was never part of the original story. While SP's makers - being part of the Disney Company, had every choice in the world: They had every right to turn Fluffy into anything they wanted because they worked at the same company.
@ Sofiel:
It is Kiara, but that's why it's not _just_ Kiara but Fluffy/Kiara. As in Fluffy for that it originally wasn't anyone, but Kiara because in the end they turned Fluffy into Kiara in the official storyline. Fluff/Kiara would be the most correct way to refer to the original design of the cub.
"Now on Fluffy's looks, albeit most say that it's genderless...
...the bottom of the ears are darker as well which is also a trait for the male characters."
But not as infants. Simba didn't have dark ear rings when he was a baby. This could be one way they aimed at a genderless design. As could be the fact that Simba had fruit juice on his forehead whereas Fluffy does not.
"Now as far as being so adamant about who fluffy was is ok, but people really shouldn't get to attached to their ideals about fluffy because until an interview is given or a letter is written to and answered by the Original Lion king movie crew nothing is certain, it's just what we've seen and gathered from the movie's and books, and not straight out of the horses mouth, so to speak."
But we HAVE heard the Original Lion King movie crew's vision. Fluffy is not a fan-made nickname. It is indeed straight from the mouths of the producer and the directors of the original Lion King. Thus to them, it's Fluffy as in no one. And then, as there is also an official movie sequel which has blended Kiara and Fluffy into one in an official content, Kiara is the most official identity to Fluffy.
"BUT this is a very good graphic ."
Thank you.
Now on Fluffy's looks, albeit most say that it's genderless, I find that fluffy looks male....now i don't think that it is Kopa, but FLuffy looks male, when you compare him to infant Simba and look ate the eye brows and Nose shape they are consistent with TLK movie universe males, even at such a young age. the bottom of the ears are darker as well which is also a trait for the male characters.
Now as far as being so adamant about who fluffy was is ok, but people really shouldn't get to attached to their ideals about fluffy because until an interview is given or a letter is written to and answered by the Original Lion king movie crew nothing is certain, it's just what we've seen and gathered from the movie's and books, and not straight out of the horses mouth, so to speak.
BUT this is a very good graphic
Cooper
Previous
Next