Animation Source Forums

All Dogs 2, although it isn't even a patch on the original.

Balto123

I like WolfQuest a lot better than All Dogs Go to Heaven 2.

Both are OK..tough I don't like that much Wolf Quest.

Can't really choose because I don't reallly like either. Adgth2 was kinda pathetic up to the orignal, the characters personalities bugged me the most on how much they changed. And with WQ, I don't like it much because of the animation.

Animation is nothing to making characters completely different, and at least Wolf Quest had a real plot, so Wolf Quest for me.

I have never watched ADGTH2, so I can't make any judgements

hate both of them. in both the characters really changed. and they never really matched up to the orignals.

WQ was a much better movie

I really disliked them both. It's so disappointing that so many sequels to good movies aren't that good.

I chose All Dogs Go To Heaven 2. It had a much better storyline, and it wasn't as childish as Wolf Quest. Plus, it had much better animation. I didn't spot any bloopers.

Wow, no bloopers, that's rare. I will have to rent it

From watching All Dogs go to Heaven 2 for nearly ten years now (since 1996) I have studied the movie as I got older, and I have spotted many bloopers! Two examples: The scene where he talks to Carface on Earth in the club, Charlie was wearing the red collar before he got it from Red. And while he was talking to Annabelle(sp?) in heaven, their paws were drawn to be on clouds the whole time, but sometimes they're not on a cloud.

Wow. I haven't watched ADGTH2 in a long while! *will probably buy/rent it soon* Well, each film had its pros and cons, and both films also took some drastic risks - check this out:

All Dogs Go To Heaven 2

Pros:
- Brought back the characters that we know and love
- Catchy songs (from what I can remember of it)
- Decent story (or should I say: stories?) with a familar setting
- Theatrical release (quite rare for an animated sequel)

Cons:
- Animation quality was horrible!
- Mostly all new voices (with exception of a few key ones - mainly Itchy, for example)
- Was a jumble of a movie . . . . (falling in love, helping a runaway kid, finding a heavenly horn . . . . GAH, it's too much)
- Uhh, setting/time change much? (the last one was in 1930s New Orleans . . . this one: 1990s San Francisco. What the heck?)
- No Killer! (wah, I liked Killer . . . thank goodness he returned for the TV series)

And the competitor:

Balto II: Wolf Quest

Pros:
- Beautiful backgrounds and use of imagery
- Nice use of Inuit/Spiritual information
- Quite different and risky plot (but hey, I think it worked)

Cons:
- Again with the animation quality (not perfect, forever changing)
- An all-new cast (they couldn't compare to the original cast, but at least they improved in WoC!)
- Too much focus on Aleu - not enough on Balto (How about this: Call it "Aleu's Movie" instead?)
- Uhh, out of character much? (the whole "wolf" thing, the overprotectiveness, Jenna . . . . 'nuff said.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, with that said, I'll tell you that I preferred Wolf Quest than ADGTH2. The story grabbed my attention more, while the continuing adventures of Charlie and Itchy were just flat and plain. Sorry, you angelic mutts. The hybrid wolves got you beat.

That's my two cents. Tell me if I missed anything!

- Juuchan17