Animation Source Forums

Do you think that they should make her have Jenna's markings but kept the same fur color?I just think the animators are lazy and wanted to make Dusty look like an Aleu clone...

For once again Dusty is NOT Aleu clone. Neither she was ever meant to look like Aleu...
http://www.animationsource.org/balto/en ... id_film=12



exclusive-phil-weinstein-interview-t4503.html

I mean no offense, but you rather contradicted yourself in this topic. You're concerned about Dusty being a Aleu clone, but on the other hand you're asking us if you think Dusty would be better as a Jenna clone.

But as for an answer, no. Why? Because Dusty is NOT an Aleu clone.



This topic is pretty much pointless.

Respectfully, as others said above, Dusty is not an Aleu clone. They have similarities, but fur color and facial pattern is not enough to consider them clones.
As for the fur color. It's the same general brightness level, but the shades are very different. Aleu's shade is a light brown while Dusty's is almost lavender.
Their facial patterns are similar simply because the pattern goes all the way down to the nose. In addition, as the others pointed out their builds and general fur pattern is in no way similar. They are their own characters.

However, I do agree that in Balto II, everything got lazy. The animation and smaller details in the designs were inconsistent from the first because the movies changes producers and animators.

They, honestly, really look nothing alike apart from some similar facial markings as the others have pointed out, so it's clear that Dusty is not an Aleu clone- and of course the body builds of both characters are very different.

Completely agree here.

sorry if I didn't get my question straight...maybe we should lock this topic

Total agree, topic is pointless. Try looking at screenshots both from Balto 2 and 3. There is NO clone.

Alaskan you're just repeating what others have said. Thus spamming, never mind bringing up a pretty much dead topic. You didn't need to post.

Locked.