Sorry for "the f word", I didn't notice at all. It won't happen again.

Brown Wolf wrote:
Just because Disney says Scar didn't have any kids doesn't make it true.
Lol. But of course it doesn't! Like, what do Scar's creators know about Scar? Certainly not the truth! [/sarcasm] (As in, it's not just Disney who said so, it was Scar's creators, the film makers themselves.)
Brown Wolf wrote:
How could he have ruled for two or three years without having an heir or heiress to the throne? You seriously believe that, El? There is simply no logic in saying that Scar didn't have any kids. He's the King and he would have needed an heir.
Yes, I seriously believe that because it's a completely logical fact from Scar's creators. Scar INTENTED to make an heir as he indeed is a king and needs such, but he didn't have one. It's also entirely possible and entirely logical: perhaps Scar just didn't consider anyone worthy of being his mate and the mother of his child, until Nala grew up and he set his eye on her. Even if ignored the fact from Scar's creators that he didn't even think about making cubs before late at which point he tried to get Nala for his wife, we could also imagine he just did not succesfully mate with anyone during those years which by the way had to be at least 5 in number, judging by Simba's physical development.
Brown Wolf wrote:
And just because Chumvi didn't exist in the movie universe, doesn't mean he didn't exist as whole. Surely Simba and Nala weren't the only cubs born in the Pridelands during Mufasa's rule.
And I never said Chumvi doesn't exist as whole. Just that as he doesn't exist in the movies, he can't officially be the father of anyone in the movies.