Kopa

The Batman · **Posted:** Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:21 pm

The best I can think is that they thought Kiara would be more intresting...
(Personally think Kopa is better)

Kieran · **Joined:** Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:44 pm **Posts:** 98

Of course Disney approved of the books. They have "Disney" logo on them, don't they. But just because they approve something as books, doesn't automatically mean they want them into everything they do. The fact that they approved also "Friends In Need" which contradicts that book series' content, only proves more that they mean the books and the movies as seperate entities.

My best common sense guess is that the main reason why Kopa wasn't in TLKL2 is because he was not created by Disney's emplyees AND was created into books. I don't know of any Disney classic cartoon franchise wherein they would've used anything from books in their movies. The books they obviously mean as nothing more but merchandise.

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:42 am

kopa was not made by TLK'S creators. :wink:

ChingChongChi-Neez · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:33 am

Who is Kopa?

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:07 am

kopa is simba and nala's unofficial son . he only appears in tlk6na. the cub you see in the end of tlk is female , kiara/fluffy.

ChingChongChi-Neez · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:23 am

What??? Simba and Nala only had Kiara.

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:33 am

i know. that's what i meant . the only cub simba had was kiara. but so many people are brain washed saying simba and nala had a son , kopa.

Brown Wolf · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:26 pm

TLKGIRL98 wrote:

i know. that's what i meant . the only cub simba had was kiara. but so many people are brain washed saying simba and nala had a son , kopa.

If Disney had stuck to it's original plan - having the cub at the end of the first film be a boy, Chaka, this whole matter would be put to rest. I think, and probably always will, that Simba and Nala had a son before Kiara. And, TLKGIRL98, to say that so many people are 'brainwashed' by saying that Simba and Nala had a son is just plain rude. We who believe that there was a son are not brainwashed in any way. We just like to believe that the writers of The Lion King 2 made a mistake, and so did the animators by changing Simba and Nala's appearance.

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:30 pm

what i mean by ''brainwashed'' is telling people what is not true , or when you say something you think is true to say it officially when it's not true. sorry if i was being rude , it's the truth.

Brown Wolf · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:45 pm

TLKGIRL98 wrote:

what i mean by ''brainwashed'' is telling people what is not true , or when you say something you think is true to say it officially when it's not true. sorry if i was being rude , it's the truth.

How about you let people believe what they want.

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:46 pm

does not give you the right to be mean to me.

BALTOGIRL98 · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:05 pm

I'm sorry if i am , but I'm stating the truth.

Brown Wolf · **Posted:** Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:32 pm

If it's the truth, everyone would agree. But the real truth is that you're just stating your opinion.

Also, read this: http://fanart.lionking.org/Artists/Tima ... ahblah.jpg

Animation Source Forums

Kopa