View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
Paxis
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:24 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:20 pm Posts: 1935 Location: Florida, US
Gender: Female
|
I actually agree with you 100%... Many think it's easy to find sites, but like you've stated... HybridFuse(TR) wrote: 1. They have nothing to do with the stuff you're looking for. Like if you search "Balto" and such, you get somethings like Baltimore.. and concerts. Nothing to do with wolves or lions there.
2. Most of these sites are dead. When there's dead sites, there is a lesser chance that you may actually get members there. Dead sites don't gain a lot of attention, and the webmasters may have little or no interest in updating it.
3. Some of the sites are actually movie database sites where they give you ONLY information about the movie (TLK Or Balto). And that's just all they give you. They don't display sites and they absolutely have nothing interesting for people to really look at... so they are also most likely dead.
And then there are other sites that really aren't suitable for sending requests to.. such as government sites or sites that older people go onto.
1. Most of us in the world don't know any thing about the movie Balto. A small handful would actually still be interested and join our site. Which is good, but it sorta' gets us nowhere.
2. Government sites, even American ones, are strictly based on one certain subject. If it's wolves. It's just wolves. Nothing fantasy of the sort. Not even a decent movie like Balto. IF it's about researching lions, then that's the theme of the site. Any other site request sent there that has nothing to do with what they're trying to grasp to the public is really nothing of importance to them.
3. Some sites are only made for older kids, teens, and adults. These sites sometimes don't really have warm candidates for newer BS or TLK members, because of the activities they may do on those sort of sites.
It's extrmely hard to find sites now. Either they're popular, and have the sites, or they're dead. Or are even just for teens or non-child friendly sites. I also agree right here with many of some fellow webrankers (Won't be stating names) of which I haven't seen ANY of them finding sites. Or posting progress, by that fact. But what I would say would exactly be these reasons as well: HybridFuse(TR) wrote: 1. They're lazy.
2. They only wanted to be webranker to get a blue name.
3. They wanted attention and an excuse to be modding. This topic shouldn't be flamed, and it's actually an exellent heads up to people.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Anayu
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:16 am |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:19 pm Posts: 1113 Location: The verse
Gender: Female
|
|
Some excellent points, Hybrid. And I agree. No offense meant to any of the webrankers out there, especially the ones who have been trying their hardest to help out, but the position is becoming kind of useless. Just from listening in on some shout box convos and hearing you guys say that you can't find anything, it's easy to see you're working, but there's really just nothing left to do. Most of the Balto-related sites have either shut down, or have no traffic whatsoever running through them, so it's pretty much useless to contact them and ask for advertisements. And any other appropriate sites have already been contacted usually, which leaves just the inappropriate ones, like what you mentioned. It wouldn't make sense to contact those websites and hope to get additional traffic through here.
So, I think that the number of webrankers should be severely reduced, maybe to only one or two at most, who can seek out wolf-related roleplay or even just wolf-related sites that are somewhat child-oriented to put up a link, or button. That's really the only domain there is left, and there's no need in having some 10+ people to do that job.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
UKthewhitewolf
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:06 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:17 pm Posts: 5061 Location: Britain.
Gender: Female
|
|
I also agree with this completely.
I know Steet will probably say "ANY link back helps, even on a site not related" which is true but you can't really ask people to go to ANY site they find and ask for a link back to BS or LKS because admins of said sites want to keep their links related. A site about cooking, for example, probably won't link back to a site about a cartoon.
I know that if you search "Balto" in Google there are thousands of results but BS is the fifth link down. In a search for images with the word "Balto" there are pictures on the first page from BS.
Lion King is harder but that's because there are so many places selling the DVDs or tickets to the musicals, a search for just "Lion King" kicks out pretty much all links to those but a search for "Lion King fansite" has LKS third down. Same when you search that in images. A search for just "Lion King" in images has links back to BS on the 4th page.
That's not bad to be honest.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mighty
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:44 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:22 pm Posts: 4803 Location: Michigan
Gender: Female
|
|
I agree with this. What more can we do? I try, but I'm just not finding anything.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
saske italian wolf
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:52 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:45 am Posts: 6491
|
like everyone here, I agree with you MB... HybridFuse(TR) wrote: 1. They have nothing to do with the stuff you're looking for. Like if you search "Balto" and such, you get somethings like Baltimore.. and concerts. Nothing to do with wolves or lions there.
yes, this happen to me everytime I search "Balto" on the net...no related sites or sources with wolves or sled dogs, maybe the last ones... HybridFuse(TR) wrote: 2. Most of these sites are dead. When there's dead sites, there is a lesser chance that you may actually get members there. Dead sites don't gain a lot of attention, and the webmasters may have little or no interest in updating it.
3. Some of the sites are actually movie database sites where they give you ONLY information about the movie (TLK Or Balto). And that's just all they give you. They don't display sites and they absolutely have nothing interesting for people to really look at... so they are also most likely dead.
yeah, because there are only old sites that are abandoned, deleted or completely dead and if you're searching a good site, what do you find? only the same, boring information about the movies and stop. And sources like wikipedia doesn't give you good sites about Balto or TLK... HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Lastly, there ARE some webrankers who actually try not to do their jobs. These webrankers shouldn't be messed up with the webrankers that get little amounts of sites, yet they're trying to make things work out. 1. They're lazy.
2. They only wanted to be webranker to get a blue name.
3. They wanted attention and an excuse to be modding.
Think about it people. Don't rush an issue and immediately say: "You're wrong." Or even "you're right." Think this issue thoroughly before sounding out. well, these are the classical lazy people -.- or who only want to show that he's a mod or something like that....the pathetic ones... do you all mind if I ask a simple question?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mighty
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:21 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:22 pm Posts: 4803 Location: Michigan
Gender: Female
|
|
Another thing is, people are requesting to be added to the webranking team. Its not fair for them, as they won't have any site to contact. anyone agree with my statement?
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
saske italian wolf
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:50 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:45 am Posts: 6491
|
Mightybalto1925 wrote: Another thing is, people are requesting to be added to the webranking team. Its not fair for them, as they won't have any site to contact. anyone agree with my statement? yes, that's right...someone first say that he/she knows a lot of sites where post the link of BS to take members but after, well, who cares? he/she became a webranking and he/she doesn't do the work of a webranker -.-
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Sushi Roll
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:55 am |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:16 pm Posts: 1203 Location: Canaderland
Gender: Female
|
HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Most importantly, members on the site sometimes call us mini-mods. If we're on BS and something happens, we would try getting that person to stop. Everyone does, even the normal members. They call us mini mods. What about the members that DO try handling situations? We can't always have the blame. Plus if we can't do it, then why should the members even care to tell someone to stop "doing sms?" To stop cussing.. etc? If we can't do it, they shouldn't either. We webrankers are normal members too. We aren't mods.. and we HAVE the right to help make this site more user-friendly. Those members can stop trying to be a mod too.
Oh. My. God. Yes. I have heard this around the site and I have SEEN it on the shoutbox. It really ticks me off...cause they group us (webrankers) into ONE category. Apparently, all of us are power hungry, wanna-be mods. Yep. Every single one of us. =) ...Not. It's really irritating...Cause I do know some are actually like that, but guess what people, we aren't ALL the SAME...Sadly, some members are too close minded and busy complaining to see it. HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Lastly, there ARE some webrankers who actually try not to do their jobs. These webrankers shouldn't be messed up with the webrankers that get little amounts of sites, yet they're trying to make things work out.
1. They're lazy.
2. They only wanted to be webranker to get a blue name.
3. They wanted attention and an excuse to be modding.
Agreed...There are currently 13 webrankers...Some have even yet to post even ONE link in the Activity Topic... Shouldn't webrankers who haven't done ANYTHING yet, without an excuse, be removed? I mean...They aren't helping =|
_________________ <3Claymore<3

(c)Bastet
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mighty
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:42 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:22 pm Posts: 4803 Location: Michigan
Gender: Female
|
AutumnTornado wrote: HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Most importantly, members on the site sometimes call us mini-mods. If we're on BS and something happens, we would try getting that person to stop. Everyone does, even the normal members. They call us mini mods. What about the members that DO try handling situations? We can't always have the blame. Plus if we can't do it, then why should the members even care to tell someone to stop "doing sms?" To stop cussing.. etc? If we can't do it, they shouldn't either. We webrankers are normal members too. We aren't mods.. and we HAVE the right to help make this site more user-friendly. Those members can stop trying to be a mod too.
Oh. My. God. Yes. I have heard this around the site and I have SEEN it on the shoutbox. It really ticks me off...cause they group us (webrankers) into ONE category. Apparently, all of us are power hungry, wanna-be mods. Yep. Every single one of us. =) ...Not. It's really irritating...Cause I do know some are actually like that, but guess what people, we aren't ALL the SAME...Sadly, some members are too close minded and busy complaining to see it. HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Lastly, there ARE some webrankers who actually try not to do their jobs. These webrankers shouldn't be messed up with the webrankers that get little amounts of sites, yet they're trying to make things work out.
1. They're lazy.
2. They only wanted to be webranker to get a blue name.
3. They wanted attention and an excuse to be modding.
Agreed...There are currently 13 webrankers...Some have even yet to post even ONE link in the Activity Topic... Shouldn't webrankers who haven't done ANYTHING yet, without an excuse, be removed? I mean...They aren't helping =| Yes, they should be removed...13 to me is way to many.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Paxis
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:08 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:20 pm Posts: 1935 Location: Florida, US
Gender: Female
|
HybridFuse(TR) wrote: Quote: Yes, they should be removed...13 to me is way to many.
I just remembered.. It seems like everyone nowadays can become webrankers. which is another problem adding on to the list of reasons why some people don't do their jobs. True. The word just flies around. "Popularity" >_>
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
blista compact
|
Post subject: Re: The Downside of Webranking Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:29 pm |
|
|
| Living here |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:33 am Posts: 926 Location: Manhattan, New York
|
|
I rather not be in a webranking group, I just want to be one man rank man. It's a long way.
_________________ "Brooklyn is the new Manhattan, Manhattan is the new Queens, and Queens is the new Brooklyn." -Ted Dansen as George Christopher Bored To Death
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|