JerseyCaptain wrote:
Well, apparently a second hole was made in the design of the toy. However, as the letter from the company indicates, a machining error resulted in the smaller of two holes not being opened sufficiently. Whether this was an isolated problem, or a larger assembly line one is unknown. But the company did apologize, did take care of the pet owner's veterinary costs, and did take immediate steps to correct the problem. Not all companies would do that...at least not right away.
The only negligence I see on the part of this company was that their quality control process failed here. And they admitted as much.
Well, that was very responsible of them. I didn't know that they payed for the costs and such. I still think, though, that they should more thoroughly check the toys before shipping them off.
Gotta read the whole story, Lowin.