View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
ShebaDove {wolf}
|
Post subject: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:18 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:14 am Posts: 2242 Location: Back in cold wet England, wishing I was in dear old New Zealand.
Gender: Female
|
|
I was watching Titanic yesterday and something occurred to me. After Jack and Rose they escape from the storage room and start playing about on the deck.The 2 crewmen in the crows nest are watching for icebergs are watching them instead. They look up and almost instantly see the iceberg, maybe if they had been looking ahead like they were supposed to they might of seen it earlier. so, in the movie maybe Jack and Rose indirectly caused the collision?
Of course this was only in the movie, an I am not blaming Jack And Rose!
What do you think?
Sheba
_________________ I am still ShebaDove {wolf} I had problems when I tried to change (it was too long). Now my it has changed back to my old one in some places on the forums but it is still ShebaDove {wolf} elsewhere! I will pm a mod about it.
Art / Images <--Linkz!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Balto_freak
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:01 pm |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:11 pm Posts: 369
|
|
I was also thinking about that as I watched that many times! I'd say yes, they did!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Cobaltié
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:31 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:45 am Posts: 2360
Gender: Female
|
|
In the movie, yeah XD
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
soliars
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:03 am |
|
|
| Young pup |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:56 am Posts: 2
|
I have no idea. But we should realize that it is a film and the story need they did this. download youtube
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
gemmawolf
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:51 pm |
|
|
| Beginner |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:58 pm Posts: 89 Location: In the TARDIS, next stop everywhere.
Gender: Female
|
|
i know what you mean, but why were they watching jack and rose kiss instead of doing their job? i mean, two people joined at the lips isnt that exciting!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
gemmawolf
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:52 pm |
|
|
| Beginner |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:58 pm Posts: 89 Location: In the TARDIS, next stop everywhere.
Gender: Female
|
Swords of the Wolves wrote: I think it was just the director's theory of why the guys in the crow's nest didn't see the iceberg long before they should have. Although, I think in the real incident it was because it was so foggy that night, and they didn't have radar back in 1912. are you sure it was fog? apparently it was a very clear night. the water was perfetly still and so it couldn't be seen breaking against the ice berg. then it was too late...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Swords of the Wolves
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:06 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 1947 Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
|
gemmawolf wrote: Swords of the Wolves wrote: I think it was just the director's theory of why the guys in the crow's nest didn't see the iceberg long before they should have. Although, I think in the real incident it was because it was so foggy that night, and they didn't have radar back in 1912. are you sure it was fog? apparently it was a very clear night. the water was perfetly still and so it couldn't be seen breaking against the ice berg. then it was too late... Well, I checked some sources, and the real reason why they didn't see the iceberg in time was because someone locked up their binoculars in some cupboard, and forgot to leave the key on board, so the key was left in England, so nobody could get to them. If they had used their binoculars, they might have seen it earlier, but since they had to use their own, unaided eyes, they couldn't see that far ahead.
_________________ Thanks to Silver Deni for the avatar!
Check out the Animation Source podcast! http://www.animationsource.org/board/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=28389


I've got a photography book for sale! Go here: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/636080
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Ahura
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:57 pm |
|
|
| Living here |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:54 pm Posts: 875 Location: In the snow capped mountains of Northern Gaia.
Gender: Male
|
|
Jack and Rose were never real people although there was a Dawson on the Titanic named Joseph Dawson who did die that night. I believe that they never caused the sinking in the film since well they never existed.
_________________ "We humans fear the beast within the wolf because we do not understand the beast within ourselves" -Gerald Hausman “For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack”- Rudyard Kipling
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Ice Cream Cone
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:55 pm |
|
|
| Beginner |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:35 pm Posts: 198 Location: tennessee
|
|
uh, kinda, cause they did draw the attention of the people in the crow's nest, but then again, it was dark and it was hard to see
_________________ ????
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Ara Darkfire
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:02 pm |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 4:11 pm Posts: 225
Gender: Female
|
|
No, they did not actually.
There were several problems, really, that led into it. April 14, 1912 was a moonless night, they didn't have binoculars (David Blair took the key to where the binoculars were stored when he left the ship at Southampton) - but even with binoculars it would be hard to see the dark side of an iceberg, the ship was going quite fast (due to Ismay's and Smith's determination to beat the Olympic) - plus it was less than a minute between Fleet's announcement of an iceberg and the collision. Plus, Smith was not on the bridge at the time of the collision - it was Murdoch who was on duty.
If you pay attention to Ismay (who is the president of White Star Line - which is presently under Cunard (who had the ships Lusitania, Mauretania, Carpathia (who rescued the survivors), the Queen Mary, and the Queen Mary 2) in the film, you'd find him pressing Smith (who was planning on retiring), to speed the ship up - so in other words, Ismay and Smith would be the indirect cause of the sinking. It really didn't matter if the lookouts were paying attention to Rose and Jack, as they couldn't actually see it until it was too late.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Conay
|
Post subject: Re: Titanic, did Jack and Rose indirectly cause the sinking? Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:40 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:39 am Posts: 5603 Location: Dartford, Kent, England, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland, Europe, Planet Earth.
Gender: Male
|
Ahura Werewolf wrote: Jack and Rose were never real people although there was a Dawson on the Titanic named Joseph Dawson who did die that night. I believe that they never caused the sinking in the film since well they never existed. Yes, I have a special Titanic book wth the list of the dead, I also saw this. gemmawolf wrote: i know what you mean, but why were they watching jack and rose kiss instead of doing their job? i mean, two people joined at the lips isnt that exciting! It was a little more than "Kissing" more like "Snogging". In them days all pornography or evan just snogging amazing, unlike today, if you saw somlike doing that, you would walk past it like it was just a phone box.
But I doubt they did, since the sea was not rough, they could not see the waves bashing against the Iceburg, not too mention the noise from the Titanic at 22knots against the sea was pritty loud, not too mention they could hear the engines running. + the wind, I doubt it still would of been too late to see it, evan if they where too see it a minute earlier, it would still would of hit, maybe just furthor down the ship.
_________________ Here's to the crazy ones...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|