Togo wrote:
And I can't really understand why. Sure, it isn't a perfect movie, but it deserves a lot more than a C. Maybe they base their mark on how well the movie went in cinemas?
Not perfect? Surely not, but I haven't seen a single movie that I'd rate higher than it. I think the media sources just judged it with an irrational criteria since it was a hand-animated that went up against Toy Story.
Togo wrote:
For exemple Paolo Mereghetti (the most important Italian reviewer) gave Balto 2.5 out of 4 (considering that he's VERY strict, it's a really good mark) saying that "it's better than most Disney cartoons in 90s, but it lacked of marketing that is necessary to make the movie famous".
They factor in marketing when they judge movies?