Animation Source Forums

Well, I can't help but like WQ the best. Why? Well, it was the first balto movie that I actually owned, and saw. So, then I grew more attached to it. But yeah, Balto1 was definatley was better animation-wise

You people are 100% right. The animation is horrible. I'm not an Aleu fan, but the wolf thing was cool. What I get curious about is what happened to the snow?? But you're right. Animation in WQ=poor. And it really has no chance when Balto and the White Wolf howl in B1

it was summer so the snow melted a little

I really can't understand if the only purpose of this topic is sullying Balto 2 and 3.
However seeing the success of the first Balto, I'd feel lucky to have not one, but two sequels, and pretty good ones to my opinion. The animation is worse than in the 1st one, but 1st point: it's not so ugly, 2nd point: it's completly normal that the sequels are inferior (and with a less budget) than the first one, especially if we aren't talking about a successful movie like unfortunately Balto is.
And about WoC, I think the animation isn't bad at all. Maybe the characters have some changes, but talking about the animation, it's good, it's only different from Balto 1's one.

It's because people expects more and more from the movie.What I think is when they wanted to make Balto3 they said like "Wow!This will be the year's movie!Btter then the other two!I will proof!People will love it!They wil buy!" They did these things? NO!Why?Because No advertising,no good quality,not very respected proportionality of the characters!No Nothing!
The storyline are both nice but the tehnique of making them wasn't as we anted.If Balto2 and 3 were created by the same style as the first?How it would be?How would Kodi,Aleu look like?Most of you asks this question.
But the Wolf Quest was low and poor because low budget as we know..and the rushing,they simply rushed so they can finnaly put it on the market ..Hoping it will have more idols then the Original,and get popularer,It succed?No..Why?(Read what I posted above)
Remember The Universal animation style and spirit isn't like the Disney..(That's why The Lion King is more popularer arround the world then Balto).

Well at a few parts it didn't look ok but to me WOC was way worce then any of them.

Well WC was way more crisp then the other two, even though the mix od dimention kinda killed a few sceans it was more crisp.

Balto 1 was good in animation but really bad when it came to clearity and WOC was really bad with clearity aswell, like some parts the dogs looked so bad that it just wasn't good at all, but some parts were good but lots no.

Thanks someone who agrees^^

The animation was terrible, but i still liked the characters & their voices. Unlike some people, they just hate the whole movie its self, personally just because animation is bad doesnt mean i dont like movies! I really loved Wolf Quest, but they could have done better animation.

Balto had the best animation, & i think WoC had bad animation its self. I didnt really like Balto3 at all................... xD

Maya has spoken

-Maya

I TOTALLY AGREE!

Very true, but it fit in much better. Until you pointed it out, I never would have noticed.

Balto the original film was done entirly on the computer, all films have faults. Those are small and nearly un-noticable, heavenly compared to the 'crap' in the sequels.

Balto 2 was far from a powerful story [no offense if you like it] But the story lacked so much, should have just been a fan-fic not even made into a film.