View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
cybunnys_rock
|
Post subject: Re: * BREAKING * Message from Glenn Ross Himself...!!! Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:27 am |
|
|
| Newcomer |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:13 am Posts: 26
|
Suka wrote: Latest update upon what our little petition has gotten us into!!  This is not an e-mail, but an actual letter that came through the post...along with our petition. --------------- " We had been entertaining the idea of producing another Balto movie, but the sad truth is that not enough people bought the last one to make it attractive to produce another. You see, in order to be able to produce a film, we have to know enough people are interested in buying it to be able to pay for the cost and marketing.
We really like the Balto character and are pleased to know that there are people like you out there that are such big fans. Get out!!! My best regards, DICTATED BUT NOT READ,
Glenn Ross--------------- It was the last thing I expected to hear a reply today by mail. But the most puzzling thing about it all is why he sent back our petition. Well...he included free copies of Balto and Wolf Quest on DVD for me.  Which was sincerely nice of him. XD
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
CopperTail
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:43 pm |
|
|
| Newcomer |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:23 pm Posts: 25
|
|
I find it ironic that we have 18 (Not excaggerating) LBT sequals and they won't make a Balto 4.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KuroOkami
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:52 pm |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:39 pm Posts: 380 Location: Resembool
Gender: Female
|
|
Exactly. After all, no matter how bad anyone thinks the Balto sequels are, they will always be better than some of the garbage that LBT dishes out.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Dreaming Wolf
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:09 pm Posts: 1202
Gender: Male
|
wolf_sister wrote: Exactly. After all, no matter how bad anyone thinks the Balto sequels are, they will always be better than some of the garbage that LBT dishes out.
The problem with LBT is they bring in the money because people are STILL buying them today, lol. They could afford one more Balto, and maybe bring in some of the older animation too!
_________________ Fruit Loops are gay Cheerios. Yummeh <3
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
steet
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 1:56 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:14 am Posts: 5743 Location: France
Gender: Male
|
CopperTail wrote: I find it ironic that we have 18 (Not excaggerating) LBT sequals and they won't make a Balto 4.
Err, no, not 18  At the time, LBT 12 will be released next year and LBT 13 is planned.
_________________ Webmaster of Animation Source, and more
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Fox
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:52 am |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:05 pm Posts: 314 Location: G€rm@ný
Gender: Male
|
Dreaming Wolf wrote: The problem with LBT is they bring in the money because people are STILL buying them today, lol. They could afford one more Balto, and maybe bring in some of the older animation too!
They buy them cuz they do advertise more than for the Balto films... and THAT is REALYY sad...
_________________ Balan ú hí!!!Ah in pint in "i barf" ú thîr!!!
Homo sapiens < Homo stupidus (stupidus)
Puella Rigensis ridebat
Quam tigris in tergo vehebat;
Externa profecta,
Interna revecta,
Risusque cum tigre manebat
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Swords of the Wolves
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 5:48 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 1947 Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
|
|
Aren't animated movies rather low-budget anyway (no offense to the Balto movies intended)? I mean, there aren't any sets you need, all you really need are actors for voices and animators to draw. I've heard of a bunch of movies that didn't do that well but they still made a sequel because it would leave the fans of that movie dissappointed. If this guy went to this site and saw how many people are Balto fans, couldn't he just make a fourth one just to see how well that would do? It really shouldn't be that hard to make an animated movie anyway and Universal gets billions of dollars anyway from other movies, so if Balto 4 doesn't do that well, that would be only a small dent in their budget, wouldn't it?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
steet
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:47 pm |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:14 am Posts: 5743 Location: France
Gender: Male
|
|
No, traditonally animated films requires a lot of money on the contrary. More than 3D films in fact, and more than the average live action film.
If you want a proof, then just wonder why they aren't doing anymore traditionally animated film these days, only 3D...
_________________ Webmaster of Animation Source, and more
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Swords of the Wolves
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 3:35 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 10:41 am Posts: 1947 Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
|
steet wrote: No, traditonally animated films requires a lot of money on the contrary. More than 3D films in fact, and more than the average live action film. If you want a proof, then just wonder why they aren't doing anymore traditionally animated film these days, only 3D...
Well, I still think that making the traditional animation films are more reliable than 3D. The computer generated movies in the making are subject to major technical problems like fatal errors, system crashes, etc. Also, It still doesn't make sense to me that computer generation costs less than regular animation. I think it would cost more to power 900 computers for about 10,000 hours a week (Please don't tell me that that's inaccurate, it's just a guess) than to pay a bunch of animators to use pencils and lights and colors. Besides, they can use the same animation sequences whenever they need to, and in computer generation, special effects are used all the time, and I know for a fact that those aren't cheap.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
KodiackWolf
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:57 am |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:27 pm Posts: 338 Location: Virgina Beach
Gender: Male
|
|
I know I would buy if they were to make a new movie but that most likely wont happen.
_________________ "Neither snow nor rain nor sleet nor hail will stop the US Mail" -Kodi
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
steet
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:36 am |
|
|
| Animation Source is my home! |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:14 am Posts: 5743 Location: France
Gender: Male
|
Swords of the Wolves wrote: steet wrote: No, traditonally animated films requires a lot of money on the contrary. More than 3D films in fact, and more than the average live action film. If you want a proof, then just wonder why they aren't doing anymore traditionally animated film these days, only 3D... Well, I still think that making the traditional animation films are more reliable than 3D. The computer generated movies in the making are subject to major technical problems like fatal errors, system crashes, etc. Also, It still doesn't make sense to me that computer generation costs less than regular animation. I think it would cost more to power 900 computers for about 10,000 hours a week (Please don't tell me that that's inaccurate, it's just a guess) than to pay a bunch of animators to use pencils and lights and colors. Besides, they can use the same animation sequences whenever they need to, and in computer generation, special effects are used all the time, and I know for a fact that those aren't cheap.
Well, with 3D you don't need to redraw the characters : you only make the models, that you can re-use within all the film, and this is even easier to make sequels then. You can re-use many elements. Computers are more and more powerful so with the years, it requires a smaller number of computers to generate 3D. Many effects are automatic, while for 2D you need to draw each frame of an effect. Etc etc...
_________________ Webmaster of Animation Source, and more
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
shadowphoenix21
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:29 pm |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:13 pm Posts: 287 Location: New South Wales, Australia
|
its kinad unfair I mean if they put some adverismenting or knowlage that the third one came out it would have had a better sale or put more copies out. Cause where I live 1 year I was lookin 4 a birthday present 4 my friend and she loves balto. I was goining to bye the third one 4 her but they didnt have it in where i live. 
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|