Apri-werewolf wrote:
This topic is about ANIMALS. Not humans. When you think about it in real life (not cartoons, mind you)
Dude, the fact that they're animated means that the animators can make them
more humanlike than real animals. I can safely say that Simba looks more humanlike than a real lion does. It is definitely not irrational to compare them to humans. The animators give animals many humanlike qualities.
I don't mind the fact that Chance (the american bulldog) has his penis in clear sight. But when their lips move, they show facial expressions, and they look attractive in a humanlike fashion (Stella for example),
that is completely different. Imagine if Stella stripped naked for Boris, showing everything, in Balto 3. How would that not be inappropriate?