TikTac wrote:
I think I have the answer to your Pittbull argument.
Trust me.Unlike some of us,I'm actually good with breeds.Those that claim to be breed experts yet think Dipsy is a basset and Pitts are awful should rethink their self analysis.
NOW.
Pittbulls ARE agressive by nature,yes.But are they all untrustable?No.They may be generally dominant dogs,but they're not all awful.A pittbull is unfortunately stereotyped for being a horrible pet because they're often used for fighting because of their dominance and their 'locking' jaws.NOT because they're just ruthless killers.I had a pittbull.He was too agressive for my family and we gave him up,BUT I've met a full-grown Pittbull(that happened to be a Chmpion show dog) at a Drive-In theater,a place with many dogs and people,ans he was one of the sweeted dogs ever.So frankly it depends more on the dog itself than on breed.
Now Aleuwolf1,you remind me a lot of another pittbull related argument on InternetMovieDatabase.Same little kid attitude even though you're calling others little kids,same impossible personality...you need a serious reality check.For a 'breed expert' you seem to be awfully bad at breeds.
Hopefully this has rattled some sense into you.I do not want this to become a flame war.To anyone who sees this and thinks I left,well I think I can make an exception to something as rediculous as this.
Ah ha, at last.. someone with sense and facts! Sorry for getting so flamed, TikTac.
