Sparkle Dogs

Tibbeh · **Posted:** Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:41 am

Cobaltié wrote:

On the question of relation to Balto issues, how far is that able to be stretched by the way? I just saw a char whose only relation is being Steele's great-great-granddaughter, isn't that taking it a bit too far o.O? That's almost deviating completely away from any Balto related stuff.

Yea. =\ I've seen some stretched pretty far, too.

"How she is related to Balto: Daughter of Fly Boy and Felice. Fly boy hangs out with Titanum who is related to Steele and Chester who is related to Dusty and Ralph"

That's really kind of... out there, ya know? lol. Pretty much as bad as when someone claims the relation to Balto is that their character lives in Nome. Something should probably be adressed on that, too. But I don't see that happening, either. .-.

Dee · **Posted:** Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:50 am

Just one the Balto relation thing, I personally don't think being the great-great grandaughter of an offical character is a bad relation to the films. They're connected with the offical characters right? So I'm not sure what the problem is with that ^^

But something like 'lives in Nome' or 'spoke to Balto before' is what shouldn't be accepted.

angryunicorn · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:41 am **Posts:** 3023

diego_rules wrote:

Just one the Balto relation thing, I personally don't think being the great-great grandaughter of an offical character is a bad relation to the films. They're connected with the offical characters right? So I'm not sure what the problem is with that ^^

But something like 'lives in Nome' or 'spoke to Balto before' is what shouldn't be accepted.

I agree personally :lol:

Angel Dreamer · **Posted:** Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:22 pm

Tibbeh wrote:

Cobaltié wrote:

On the question of relation to Balto issues, how far is that able to be stretched by the way? I just saw a char whose only relation is being Steele's great-great-granddaughter, isn't that taking it a bit too far o.O? That's almost deviating completely away from any Balto related stuff.

Yea. =\ I've seen some stretched pretty far, too.

"How she is related to Balto: Daughter of Fly Boy and Felice. Fly boy hangs out with Titanum who is related to Steele and Chester who is related to Dusty and Ralph"

That's really kind of... out there, ya know? lol. Pretty much as bad as when someone claims the relation to Balto is that their character lives in Nome. Something should probably be adressed on that, too. But I don't see that happening, either. .-.

I'm pretty sure you got that from one of my charrie pages xD and all I can say is, realtion to Balto universe was required so I added a relation *shrug*

*also* so therefore, I ahve to agree with what Diego said xD
it's not as if I said "she lives in Nome."

The Batman · **Posted:** Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:39 pm

Tibbeh wrote:

Yea. =\ I've seen some stretched pretty far, too.

"How she is related to Balto: Daughter of Fly Boy and Felice. Fly boy hangs out with Titanum who is related to Steele and Chester who is related to Dusty and Ralph"

Thats a pretty poor excuse of a Balto relation. O_o People here need to get it in their heads:

(Enter name here) Source.
BALTO Source
LION KING Source
TALES SPIN Source
SPIRIT source
And all those others
NOT, "oh your pweeeetttty OC source!!!!"
Also, If I might just randomly add,(A little off topic) the Raito (Graphics to your renders) are there for a reason. Again, this isn't your OC source.

Cobaltié · **Posted:** Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:49 am

Dee wrote:

Just one the Balto relation thing, I personally don't think being the great-great grandaughter of an offical character is a bad relation to the films. They're connected with the offical characters right? So I'm not sure what the problem is with that ^^

But something like 'lives in Nome' or 'spoke to Balto before' is what shouldn't be accepted.

It's starting to become a rather looong stretch to being related to Balto. Stories about the great-great-grandchildren would likely include barely anything about being related to the movie apart from characters being related, and being set in the same community.

angryunicorn · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:41 am **Posts:** 3023

Cobaltié wrote:

Dee wrote:

Just one the Balto relation thing, I personally don't think being the great-great grandaughter of an offical character is a bad relation to the films. They're connected with the offical characters right? So I'm not sure what the problem is with that ^^

But something like 'lives in Nome' or 'spoke to Balto before' is what shouldn't be accepted.

It's starting to become a rather looong stretch to being related to Balto. Stories about the great-great-grandchildren would likely include barely anything about being related to the movie apart from characters being related, and being set in the same community.

Lets tackle that once we get rid of all these mutations xD

Angel Dreamer · **Posted:** Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:03 pm

Question wrote:

Tibbeh wrote:

Yea. =\ I've seen some stretched pretty far, too.
"How she is related to Balto: Daughter of Fly Boy and Felice. Fly boy hangs out with Titanum who is related to Steele and Chester who is related to Dusty and Ralph"

Quote:

Thats a pretty poor excuse of a Balto relation. O_o

Thank you!!! no need to thank me really! xD
I don't see how that's poor. they're related now aren't they?
I think it could be quite worse. |3 and if you have a better suggestion, then don't keep it in.

--now get back on topic people.--

I suggested someone make a sparkle source xD though it's not an animated movie >.> just some weird trend, which i'm not hesitating to say, maybe even a cult. XD

Ahura · **Posted:** Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:44 am

the fact these hideous things are even allowed is mind boggling

Angel Dreamer · **Posted:** Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:05 pm

I have to say, this filter idea won't solve anything. =/
Sparkles shouldn't be here PERIOD.

Let's make a yellow, green and bright PINK pug-wolf-malamute-collie-fox mix with WINGS Balto's sister =D

there's absolutely NO relation to the balto universe with these "things" -.-

angryunicorn · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 10:41 am **Posts:** 3023

The subject keeps being brought up, and people are staying opposed to the sparklemutts.

Even tho its annoying to see this thing being brought back to life every other week, one would wonder where all of these anti-sparklemutt folks were when this was being duked out a couple months ago.

It's annoying that you're fighting a fight that whiners already won by peeing themselves. You should've spoke up when it was originally brought up, then we probably would've avoided sparkledogs from even being allowed in the first place.

Angel Dreamer · **Posted:** Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:12 pm

in that case, lock it?

Stunner · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:31 pm

I think they should be allowed, but with rules to go with it. I'm not saying they should allow people to make hot pink dogs with barbie wings, but what's wrong with an unnatural eye color ( No colors like purple, green, blue all mixed into one. Possibly light gold eyes or something? ), or unnatural markings without going overboard? I find nothing wrong with giving your character some sort of unique trait without throwing glitter all over them. When it comes to wings, bright pelt colors ( green, pink, yellow , etc. ), and headphones/etc. Those things should definitely be banned from the site. This site is pretty much made up of younger viewers, and when I was that young, I liked color and creativity.

Ahura · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:24 pm

Many of those on this site actually hate sparkledogs and strongly disagree. While this site is suppose to be kid friendly those under the age of 13 are in the minority. Many members of this site are in their late teens and into their twentys with a few being even older.

BaltoSeppala · **Posted:** Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:11 pm

Rather than retype what I have already said in another rant topic:

http://www.animationsource.org/board/post1259661.html#p1259661

Animation Source Forums

Sparkle Dogs