The worst movie youve seen

RagingBalto · **Posted:** Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:49 am

Marine310 wrote:

Forgot a series. Haha

Fast and the Furious. Great premise, HORRIBLE HORRIBLE way to do it, and filled with so much unrealistic-ness (That's right, I made up a word) that I just have to laugh at people who quote the movie trying to sound like they know about cars.

"Warning: Danger to manifold" *Floor board falls off the car.* Seriously?

"You're lucky you didn't break the welds on the manifold."

Incase I need to elaborate on that second one, there is no welds on a manifold. It's all cast, meaning it's all one piece.

Did you see the trailer for the new one? I was laughing my *** off through the whole thing.

Marine310 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:34 pm

RagingBalto wrote:

Marine310 wrote:

Forgot a series. Haha

Fast and the Furious. Great premise, HORRIBLE HORRIBLE way to do it, and filled with so much unrealistic-ness (That's right, I made up a word) that I just have to laugh at people who quote the movie trying to sound like they know about cars.

"Warning: Danger to manifold" *Floor board falls off the car.* Seriously?

"You're lucky you didn't break the welds on the manifold."

Incase I need to elaborate on that second one, there is no welds on a manifold. It's all cast, meaning it's all one piece.

Did you see the trailer for the new one? I was laughing my *** off through the whole thing.

Sadly, yes. They ruin a GNX. That made me VERY upset. Appears to be more muscle cars in it this time around (Finally ONE good thing about this series).

MudTheWolf · **Posted:** Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:36 pm

Fast and the Furious is nowhere near better than Dukes of Hazard.

Marine310 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:24 pm

kevin the grey wolf wrote:

Fast and the Furious is nowhere near better than Dukes of Hazard.

Ok...This is the WORST movie thread dude. I'm saying F&F sucked..

RagingBalto · **Posted:** Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:46 am

And Dukes of Hazzard was even worse.

MudTheWolf · **Posted:** Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:59 pm

Your right, they both sucked, but I`m just sayin, at least you can get ONE laugh out of Dukes of Hazard.

This is a list of movies that completely suck donky b**ls:

Superman
SAW II
Cats and Dogs
Peter Pan
Fast and the Furious
Monsters inc.
Back to the Future 2 (though 3 and 1 are cool, while this one is just plain boring)
Dragon Wars
Kung Fu Panda

and there are many others I can list...but the list is so long I don`t think I can fit it on :lol:

Wingrunner · **Posted:** Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:09 am

kevin the grey wolf wrote:

Your right, they both sucked, but I`m just sayin, at least you can get ONE laugh out of Dukes of Hazard.

This is a list of movies that completely suck donky b**ls:

Superman
SAW II
Cats and Dogs
Peter Pan
Fast and the Furious
Monsters inc.
Back to the Future 2 (though 3 and 1 are cool, while this one is just plain boring)
Dragon Wars
Kung Fu Panda

and there are many others I can list...but the list is so long I don`t think I can fit it on :lol:

I agree with most of your list but not all of it.

I liked Cats and Dogs, Peter Pan wasn't that bad, Superman was okay, and Kung Fu Panda was kick a**.

The worst movie ya listed was Dragon Wars by far.

blista compact · **Posted:** Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:02 am

Excessive Force (1993)
I don't want to ask why.

balto21 · **Posted:** Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:20 pm

Saw 5 it was the most borest movie i have watched i'm to the poeple (if any) that like it

Wingrunner · **Posted:** Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:17 pm

DOOMED wrote:

whitewolf17 wrote:

I got a new movie to add to my list.

In my English class we're reading Hamlet and our teacher was also showing us the movie and I have to say that it might have even been worse than dragon wars. Aside from the terrible acting there were numerous time discrepancies so I made a little game out of trying to find all of them. I've so far counted nineteen and it's not even over yet. It's definitely a terrible movie.

Which adaption are you talking about? The one from the 1940's (I believe)? The crappy, inconsistent 1990 version with Mel Gibson? The 1996 adaption that had Kenneth Branagh?

I mean the 1996 one.

It was so bad and there were so many inconsistencies like guns, and spotlights and so much more.

MudTheWolf · **Posted:** Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:04 pm

balto21 wrote:

Saw 5 it was the most borest movie i have watched i'm to the poeple (if any) that like it

You`re right, Saw 5 wasn`t even scary, it was boring, seriously, they should`ve rated it PG 13, cause that`s not what I call an MA movie, pfft, it`s either the way they made that movie, or the way thought up some "scary" bloody and gory scenes. I`ve seen Saw 2 as well, and the only part that I liked was when the stupid guy opened the door and got a bullet in his head, I kinda laughed because he was stupid enough not to know that it was a trap, and if he did know it was a trap, he could have told everyone to get out the way, and stood to the side and opened it, then the bullet would`ve gone in the wall and he would`ve lived.

Wolfhusky · **Posted:** Sun May 03, 2009 8:29 am

I have to say the day after tomorrow.That was just pointless,Pluss all the science was wrong.

tatsu_okami · **Posted:** Sun May 03, 2009 9:12 am

Crank: High Voltage; I had pretty good expectations for it after the first one, but the first Crank at least had a storyline that you could follow. The story in this was way too shallow. I'm pretty shocked that after being in some pretty fair-quality films (like "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels") that he'd sink down to a level that Crank 2 was at.

Wingrunner · **Posted:** Sun May 03, 2009 7:27 pm

Wolfhusky wrote:

I have to say the day after tomorrow.That was just pointless,Pluss all the science was wrong.

No, it was...well...it could have been a lot worse, and it's not that the science was wrong it's just they took liberties with it. The fundamentals in the science were actually pretty correct.

Animation Source Forums

The worst movie youve seen