Animation Source Forums

yeah, compare with the first movie the animation is very bad. but I enjoy the story though...I even like Aleu.

they attempted to make it 3-D, but it made the movie look bad because it was supposed to be a 2-D movie, but i still love it.

I don't think it's so terrible!

it's still a good movie, but the mix of 3-d and 2-d didn't look so well to me

I have to agree with you too, there's so much mistakes and stuff...tipical...

i thought WoC was better than WQ...

I think all three Balto movies are pretty good.

I agree with Silver Snow. Wolf Quest animation was not very good. The characters(especially Jenna) did not look the same either!

AND Balto didn't have his yellow eyes. that really made me mad. in the other two movies, he had them. it just stuck out to me.

Compared to the original if you look at Balto 2 and 3 the animation is terrible. The voice acting pretty bad though Sean Astin was very kind to lend his voice and I think did a pretty good job. A few of the characters had a bit better voice acting. It wasn't anything compared to the orginal. Honestly, look at Disney if anyone has seen Bambi 2 the animation is incredible. If they just would have given them a budget maybe they could have done something with it.

I mean no offense to the big WQ and WOC fans, I think these movies could have been alot better if they just would have been given a budget some animators with alot more experince and more money to hire voice actors. The 3D and 2D animation looks like it was put together in Photoshop while the original Balto had some computer animation put together in it. The blending was beautiful and well the sequels it was so choppy. Just goes to show you there is no cheap way to make a good animatied film. It takes hard work, time, effort and alot of patience.

-Drew

i agree. they didn't work on them hard enough, and they didn't turn out so well. and the entire thing with Balto's eyes in WQ really bothered me. i doubt it costs a lot to make his eyes yellow.