Harry Potter 7 theories....

Kalgorn · **Posted:** Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:46 pm

Well, neither the next book OR the next movie will come out this year.
Earliest we can expect to see the final book on the shelves is on the 7th of July next year.

The next HP movie, Harry Potter and the Order of the Pheonix, wont be released until July 13th, 2007.

And here is the theory i read Rainfeather:

An even more appealing clue was exposed by HP Super Sleuth Jane Clare. She feels that if Harry was a more powerful wizard than Voldemort had realized, that even as a baby, Harry may have had powers far greater than a normal wizard. What if Voldemort were wrong, and it was not a rebounded curse? What if it didn't rebound, but instead originated from Harry? We have been shown so many times how an emotional wizard child can do some interesting magic (remember Harry ended up on roofs and trees, and that he didn't need to worry about picking the lock after blowing up Marge. So, what if Harry had become extremely emotional during the attack on his family? What would he have been capable of?

Here is how HP Super Sleuth Jane Clare describes it:

I am thinking that [Harry's] scar itself may be the first and the biggest red herring that JKR dragged across our path. She reinforced, and conditioned us to think it was caused directly by Voldemort, by frequent flashbacks to that brilliant green light in the Potter's house.

The heart of my theory is that:

It was Harry himself who destroyed his family's house, in his fright and anger...
The brilliant green light was issuing from Harry, directed at Voldemort
That it was Harry himself... not his mother's love in his skin (another, related fish, from Dumbledore no less!), that caused Voldemort his setback.
Please recall that early in Book 1, Harry ... assures [Petunia] that he will not be blowing up the (Dursley's) house! If that is not a JKR clue, I don't know what is!
An extensory thought: could Voldemort's brilliant green light have been simultaneously countered by Harry's own? Harry, being more powerful, would have lived, while Voldemort would have been changed.

The quote she is referring to is the one in the "Vanishing Glass" chapter:

"And come back and find the house in ruins?" she snarled. "I won't blow up the house," said Harry, but they weren't listening.

For all those who want Lily's love to have played a key role, Jane isn't saying that her love didn't protect Harry. In fact, she is saying that not only was Harry probably protected by his mum (since we know that Voldemort couldn't touch him), but it was Harry's own love (and attempt at protection) in return, that caused the near-destruction of the house. The issue is -- was it a rebounded curse that zapped Voldemort -- or maybe a little baby Harry?

WWP thinks she is right in suggesting that we should revisit the green light clue. We also keep thinking about the potential power in Harry's green eyes, and it is our thought that Harry's green eyes may somehow have been involved in it!

Suka · **Posted:** Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:31 pm

I never took it seriously when Harry was constantly referring to himself blowing up the house; everything blows up when HE'S around. :roll:

Still, it's an ineresting theory...

Argetlam Keso · **Posted:** Sat May 06, 2006 11:06 am

thats very interesting and did you know that the harry Potter series has a backround of alchamey?

Koeyohte · **Posted:** Sun May 07, 2006 8:15 am

And one other thing: I thought that Dumbledore had suggested that Harry would be a Horcrux after Voldemort killed him... but he never got around to it, did he? So maybe they're aren't seven, just six, in thefirst place before they were destroyed. :wink:

Kalgorn · **Posted:** Sun May 07, 2006 8:57 am

balto678 wrote:

I have a theory that Harry might be killed in the 7th book.

See i think that that night when harry's parents were killed then voldemort tried to kill him. Well i think that voldemort wasn't trying to kill harry. He was setting him as a Horcrux. We found out that you have to kill someone before you can create a Horcrux. I think that the fact that voldemort was almost killed was that there may be some limit to how many horcurx's you can make OR it didn't go as he thought it would.
So in order for Voldemort to be killed, all of the horcrux's have to be destroyed. I think harry may have to sacrifice himself in order for voldemort to get finished.

yea see Kodiwolf, i thought so too

Koeyohte · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 12:52 pm

You thought what? Sorry, I don't see what you mean... I am guessing that Harry was SUPPOSED to be the seventh, but it didn't work so... there were only six. Oh and I have another idea!!

J.K. R. never said that Harry IS the one... just that Voldy thinks so. What is if it is Neveille? :shock:

Animation Source Forums

Harry Potter 7 theories....