View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
RagingBalto
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park  Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:22 am |
|
|
| Famous one |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:14 pm
Posts: 1039
Gender: Male
|
|
You mean like Limp Bizkit? They made it that far.
So have The Backstreet Boys.
Britney Spears?
Prepare for napalm drop........
Milli Vanilli.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RagingBalto
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:07 pm |
|
|
| Famous one |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:14 pm
Posts: 1039
Gender: Male
|
starsky_Hiro wrote: RagingBalto wrote: You mean like Limp Bizkit? They made it that far.
So have The Backstreet Boys.
Britney Spears?
Prepare for napalm drop........
Milli Vanilli. Now Britney and Backstreet boys does not count in, they are the real disgraces LB i have no idea about, but the other two they belong to the bunch of mucisians and bands that only play for the sake of money.....theres no talent in there.....if you knew what you were talking about then you wouldnt have said what you just said, everyone who knows something knows this, sure theres a tiny bit of talent but dont compare them with LP, LP started from scratch on their own without anyone to help them out, Spears and Backstreet boys did not start from scratch like that. You forgot about Milli Vanilli. Anyway, I pretty much hate all of today's mainstream music, so to be fair, I'll say there are much worse bands out there (Fallout Boy, Good Charlotte, whoever those guys with "disco" in their name are). It just really gets me really angry when people rave about modern commercial bands without showing any prior knowledge of rock music before 2000. I'm a rock music buff, so I guess you can say I think it's (for lack of better phrase) ignorant. When a modern commercial band shows talent equal to a band like Pearl Jam, I'll have some hope for music, but until then, I'll just listen to my nu metal-free music library. Fair enough?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
XCornflakeX
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:25 am |
|
|
| Living here |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 870
Location: You don't know and if you did know then you would know :]
Gender: Male
|
RagingBalto wrote: starsky_Hiro wrote: RagingBalto wrote: You mean like Limp Bizkit? They made it that far.
So have The Backstreet Boys.
Britney Spears?
Prepare for napalm drop........
Milli Vanilli. Now Britney and Backstreet boys does not count in, they are the real disgraces LB i have no idea about, but the other two they belong to the bunch of mucisians and bands that only play for the sake of money.....theres no talent in there.....if you knew what you were talking about then you wouldnt have said what you just said, everyone who knows something knows this, sure theres a tiny bit of talent but dont compare them with LP, LP started from scratch on their own without anyone to help them out, Spears and Backstreet boys did not start from scratch like that. You forgot about Milli Vanilli. Anyway, I pretty much hate all of today's mainstream music, so to be fair, I'll say there are much worse bands out there (Fallout Boy, Good Charlotte, whoever those guys with "disco" in their name are). It just really gets me really angry when people rave about modern commercial bands without showing any prior knowledge of rock music before 2000. I'm a rock music buff, so I guess you can say I think it's (for lack of better phrase) ignorant. When a modern commercial band shows talent equal to a band like Pearl Jam, I'll have some hope for music, but until then, I'll just listen to my nu metal-free music library. Fair enough? LP isn't new. their fisr album came out 1999. The lead vocalist is 32.
_________________
Stellar userbars made by Jenna_13!
I was killingBefore killing was cool.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Anaiyak
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:47 am |
|
|
| Advanced |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 376
Gender: Male
|
|
Funny how the thing Linkin Park originally "fought against" is the same thing they sold-out for.
I remember back when they had a unique-ish sound I hated, now they have the same sound as all the other bands I hate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
RagingBalto
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:55 am |
|
|
| Famous one |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:14 pm
Posts: 1039
Gender: Male
|
Anaiyak wrote: Funny how the thing Linkin Park originally "fought against" is the same thing they sold-out for.
I remember back when they had a unique-ish sound I hated, now they have the same sound as all the other bands I hate. Nothing was ever unique about LP. Rap-metal was one of the most tired out sub-genres in rock when they came out.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Anaiyak
|
Post subject: Re: Linkin Park Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:56 am |
|
|
| Advanced |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 376
Gender: Male
|
RagingBalto wrote: Anaiyak wrote: Funny how the thing Linkin Park originally "fought against" is the same thing they sold-out for.
I remember back when they had a unique-ish sound I hated, now they have the same sound as all the other bands I hate. Nothing was ever unique about LP. Rap-metal was one of the most tired out sub-genres in rock when they came out. Rap-rock, actually. There's nothing metal about LP. I suppose so, hence the "-ish".
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
