Animation Source Forums

Balto 1 all the way. She looked so much pretty, fluffy, and well her. =) That goes for all of them.. Balto looked -great- and awesome in Balto 1. Sigh, Balto is a movie that does NOT need a B2, 3 or anything.. No matter how good those part 2's or 3's are. =P So, I just think of B2 and B3 as copies and not true at all. Balto is forever a young wolfdog that never had pups. >=P .. Whoops, went off topic there.

well these are JENNA things

1. first movie paws were too tiny, like she can barely walk, , and tail was curled, head looked ok LOL, fur was rust/cream

2.second movie, PAWS got bigger, head was fat, tail, was not CURLED! fur looked red/white

3. third movie, paws was big, fur looked normal, tail, started the same (almost) in the first movie

BUT i can't belivie that the anamaitors would chande her design over and over again, vey lame to see her change lol

I liked her most in the first Balto movie, in the others she looks more unreal.

It's no contest really I think Jenna looked better in the first movie than any movie. I mean dispite her abnormally small paws, she moved much more natural and LOOKED more natural. And her small paws...you can't hate them. It's the style, that's how their drawn, you can't really hate someone else's style