Animation...

steet · **Posted:** Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:52 pm

It's not out at all, there is even more 3D in the third. It's just that it's much better blend with the 2D elements.

Suka · **Posted:** Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:59 pm

steet wrote:

It's not out at all, there is even more 3D in the third. It's just that it's much better blend with the 2D elements.

I didn't see as much 3D in third as I did in the second...Is that such a bad thing?

Lakoswolf · **Posted:** Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:07 pm

steet wrote:

It's not out at all, there is even more 3D in the third. It's just that it's much better blend with the 2D elements.

I would have to agree for the most part with the exception of the plane crash that seemed a little outta place, like a bit over done.

_Angel_ · **Posted:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:26 pm

I think the WQ was lousy!

Maugrim · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:07 am

steet wrote:

It's not out at all, there is even more 3D in the third. It's just that it's much better blend with the 2D elements.

Yes, it's definetely there. I didn't think it blended all that well though, steet. Especially at the start with the 'stunning blue' waves..

Koeyohte · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:15 am

werewolfwoman wrote:

do u like the animation in the second movie better than the first? I like the first animation in the first movie better..

I think the whole of the original was better. The characters, colors, backgrounds (More detail, and just nicer-looking), and animation was better. They did well on all the films animation wise, but you can see some places were it's a bit rough.

Maugrim · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:20 am

Kodiwolf-BF-RMW wrote:

werewolfwoman wrote:

do u like the animation in the second movie better than the first? I like the first animation in the first movie better..

I think the whole of the original was better. The characters, colors, backgrounds (More detail, and just nicer-looking), and animation was better. They did well on all the films animation wise, but you can see some places were it's a bit rough.

The backgrounds and colours themselves had original character. In the sequels it just seemed thrown together with no heart.

Koeyohte · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:26 am

Starsky wrote:

Kodiwolf-BF-RMW wrote:

werewolfwoman wrote:

do u like the animation in the second movie better than the first? I like the first animation in the first movie better..

I think the whole of the original was better. The characters, colors, backgrounds (More detail, and just nicer-looking), and animation was better. They did well on all the films animation wise, but you can see some places were it's a bit rough.

The backgrounds and colours themselves had original character. In the sequels it just seemed thrown together with no heart.

yes, that's a better way to put it, than what I said. At least they did a good enough job, I mean, if any of us tried it (Us amateurs :wink:

) We'd fail dismally, and say "Oh, well there IS a lot of work put into Backgrounds!" and we'de appreciate them more, I'm sure. So, yes there is detail, they were just kind of thrown together.

Maugrim · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:31 am

^ I agree.

If they'd have put more time and effort - and heart - into the movies they could have been as good as the first. I mean, look what Drew and co have produced so far on their Balto 4 trailer..

sunkissin · **Posted:** Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:41 am

Gawd, the first - no question!!! The animation in WQ was disgusting... the characters looked terrible, the 3-D effects were awful... definetely the 1st's!!!!!

Sushi Roll · **Posted:** Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:54 pm

The animation was way better int he first movie according to me.^^

(deleted user) · **Posted:** Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:17 pm

I like the first one cause, in b2 the animators we doing vary poor jobs along with the bloopers.

Animation Source Forums

Animation...