lonewolf wrote:
2d and 3d do not mix at all in my opinion i think it should have been 2d only
I can understand that. Most of the time they dont mix well, well almost all of the time. Though when used sparingly, it is fine for the most part. But then again, it also depends on the budget. IF it is low, then the effects will be cheasy. If there is enough, then the outcome will show in that, for the most part. I still long for a total 2d flick to be made in this day and age, true artistic talent shows in that, computers dont really make an artist any better, in fact, it can hinder them imo.
Again some random thoughts....