Animation Source Forums

Yes, but how?

Factories! Because normal cars and home eletricity (a simple weak 220v in Italy, I don't know about US) are only a small part of the production of CO2 in the world (I can't remember the exact %, sorry). If the world understood that we need better way to produce energy (and the nuclear one is only the first step) we would all live better. The world only needs energy, and so far we only use petrol in order to produce it. This is what I think.

I DON'T believe in global warming.


---
If the founder of The Weather Channel spoke out strongly against the manmade global warming myth, might media members notice?

We're going to find out the answer to that question soon, for John Coleman wrote an article published at ICECAP Wednesday that should certainly garner attention from press members -- assuming journalism hasn't been completely replaced by propagandist activism, that is.

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.



I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious.

(SOURCE: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-shepp ... am-history )

On the coutrary, there's a HUGE debate over it. But since normal people like to criticize, the "omg we're killing the world" story is the more famous.

No, there is no debate. What happens is that various lobby groups who don't like the idea of combating global warming (as it would infringe on their positions of wealth and power) have constructed an enormous spin-machine whose only purpose is to create the perception that there is doubt over the existence of global warming where there is in fact none whatsoever. You are obviously one of many to have fallen victim to this spin machine which intentionally sends false signals and erroneous information into the world with the only goal of fabricating doubt.
I mean, where is that so called debate? I don't see any debate. What I see is, for example, the 'IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007'. These are the world's top scientists on the matter in an organization of the UN, who came to these conclusions:

# Warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
# Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.
# Anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to the timescales associated with climate processes and feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized, although the likely amount of temperature and sea level rise varies greatly depending on the fossil intensity of human activity during the next century.
# The probability that this is caused by natural climatic processes alone is less than 5%.
...

Again, where is the debate? In 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'-documentary? If that sorry excuse for a joke is supposed to be the 'huge debate', I can only come to one conclusion: there is no debate, only lousy documentary makers with too much spare time on their hands. Global warming is real, end of story.