Cogitor wrote:
Dragon Tamer, I'm afraid the American Psychological Association, the United States Surgeon General and the majority of the scientific community (not the media) would disagree with you on all accounts, so I won't wast my time trying to refute those silly statements you made; no use in trying to disprove that which is so clearly wrong.
I always make a habit of having ammunition handy, Cogitor, and this is no exception. I've been reading a book on the subject recently, and it turns out the American Psychological Association classified homosexuality as a psychological
disorder until a group of gay-rights activists stormed one of their meetings and, in their own words, declared war on the APA if they would not de-classify homosexuality as a disorder. Moreover, I defy you to find any legitimate research which contradicts me. Many experiments and studies have been done which (on the surface) back you up, but an in-depth examination of the study methods used shows that they fialed to meet even bare minimum standards of the scientific method. Nevertheless, we are getting off-topic. If you wish to continue this via PM, I will oblige.
Cogitor wrote:
It might be a good idea to, at this point, define 'goth'. Most of the so called judging might actually be a case of false perception.
So here's one for all the goths: what makes someone goth? Is it the clothing? Or the music? Or the taste in literature? Or all of those combined?
If I had some clarity on those, I might just be less inclined to be judgmental, 'cause now I've still got the impression that being goth has a lot to do with burning candles and wearing crosses upside down. What is it about, really?
I've often wondered that myself, although I'm pretty sure burning candles and wearing crosses upside-down has to do more with Devil worship, which does (if I'm not mistaken) sometimes overlap with Goth-style dress and behavior.
To Cobalt: I favor taking an IPOV (Informed Point of View). Nonetheless, I shall try not to ruffle too many feathers while I'm here.