Animation Source Forums

yes we can eat game animals providing they are not endangered species and they are killed humanely and sensibly. (That is killed only for eating or any other good reasons).

What I meant was we shouldn't eat farmed animals/animal products from battery farming, intensive farming or those from farms that use inhumane methods.

Animals Are Not Ours to Eat- We need meat and dairy for a well-balenced diet. Call me evil! I'm a meat fanitic! Disagree 100%

Animals Are Not Ours to Wear- Yes, like Bluewolf said, leather is useful for tough, long-lasting items, such as wallets. I also own a cow-hide belt, and assorted pelts and skins. Disagree 75%

Animals Are Not Ours to Experiment On- I only tolerate animal testing when used for medicene, such as a cure for HIV/AIDS. Cosmetices are out of the question. Disagree 20%

Animals Are Not Ours to Use for Entertainment- Then again, it depends on how the animal is treated. Disagree 50%

Animals Are Not Ours to Abuse in Any Way- Agree 100%, but not in PETA's view.

Well, *I* think Peta’s intentions are good, but sometimes, when Peta people are involved, things can get, er, out of hand. Their extreme points of view take away people’s rights to own animals, buy pets from breeders, eat meat and dairy (their anti-dairy campaigns encourage people to drink beer instead of milk; what does that tell you about them?), wear leather/animal furs, and be entertained by animals at zoos or circuses. Some people just don’t understand freedom of speech and opinion. In other words, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT, WHENEVER THEY WANT, AND THERE’S NO AUTHORITY OR ORGANIZATION THAT CAN PUT AN END TO IT, SO DON’T BOTHER TRYING. One more thing that ticks me off about Peta is that they often get their message through with either violent, unnecessary, or exaggerated acts of protest. Anywho, now it’s time for my agreeing and disagreeing percentages
Animals are not ours to:

Eat: I disagree 65%. Any one should be able to eat meat and dairy, unless they choose not to or it’s against their religion. And if the animals are farmed humanely, I see no issue.

Test/Experiment on: I agree 100%!!! It’s not like we need MORE stupid eye rollers and creams to treat discoloration and fine lines; cosmetics are overrated! And if you really want to cure a disease that badly, test it on people who are going to use it.And, it just seems stupid to test an AIDS vaccine for a human on a bunny rabbit, making it think it’s receiving cruel and unusual punishment, with nothing to show for it except inaccurate results and a sick lab animal.

Entertain us: I agree 50%. If the animals like the entertainment, (and most animals do, they’re eager to please) or they’re rewarded for a job well done instead of being whipped as punishment, it’s all cool. I don’t approve of things when the animal is encouraged to kill other animals, though.

Abuse in any Way: Yes! I agree! 100%!Anyone who likes abusing animals should get help, and fast.
Well, that’s all, folks.
EDIT: Some people even call animal rights activists “terrorists.”