Animation Source Forums

Highly doubt it, the closest we have had are dinasours, and if they did find dragon fossils it would have been on the news everywhere. . Dragons are mythical creatures. Period.

I think they did exist actually. Why else would they exist in every culture? They were probably too big to go on Noah's Ark or were late to get on Who knows maybe they just exist high in the mountains where no one goes. I used too think that lost hikers on mount everest were never found because they were meals or they stepped into Dragons territory.

I personally think it's possible. I mean, possible doesn't exactly mean likely. I mean, the idea of dragons have been around since human history began! It was mainly a way of explaining things such as dinosaur bones that were just lying there on the surface, or earthquakes (dragons walking made the earth tremble, supposedly) and it probably began as a combination of a bunch of things that primitive humans learned to avoid to prevent being eaten (combining the features of giant snakes, birds of prey, and maybe things like lions and tigers into one creature). I mean, who knows? Maybe they existed at one time or another, but I don't think it's likely that they exist now, since I don't see how something that big could go hidden for so long without any trace of it's existance.

So I agree with you there. I mean they probably could have been around at once point but not now.

It's called a counter-point, my dear. And they are an effective way of turning your opponents' argeuments against them (7th grade Speech and Debate. ^^).

...Ooookay.

So anyway, I don't ever reacall seeing any hard evidence that dragons (and when I say "dragons", I mean the mythical large serpents with wings; the traditional western kind) existed. The only close thing I ever saw was this:



...and THAT was proven to be a hoax.

Suka: I just knew that was a hoax... I heard when it was found the British Natural History Museum was "interested in purchasing it" and some other universities were wanting to study it... it must have fooled a lot of people until it was revealed to be fake...

I believe they did at some point or another, ignorant people only believe in the things they see

Oh, do be kind. You must be pretty ignorant yourself to believe that.

Nah, I don't think you're crazy. I like to believe in those sorts of things as well (well... sometimes, at least. ^^ Mainly it's stuff like dragons, though) Sometimes I just want to... I mean, being an artist, (photographer, that is. Hey, it is a type of artist, you know!) I need to take on a different perspective of everything give my level of creativity a boost. It sure works well, and getting in that perspective is kind of refreshing, you know?

Suka: ah, there's a difference between knowing and believing... I never really thought of seeing as believing, but someone who doesn't believe in something is not ignorance, though. Ignorance is believing something other than what is known to be true. I won't give examples, though, because I don't want to potentially start a flame war. But basically, not believing is just that; not believing, not ignorance.