Animation Source Forums

=> Visit the Animation Source fansites!

Read the site rules!

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Would you clone your deceased pets to produce a puppy/kitten/other identical to it?
Yes 13%  13%  [ 4 ]
No 80%  80%  [ 24 ]
Yes but not for 16,000$ 7%  7%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 30
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:08 pm 
Famous one
Famous one
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1086
Location: England
Gender: Female



I don't think cloning is wrong, but it should be used in a relevant way. In some areas it is a good idea eg:

The Pyrenean Ibex is a subspecies of Ibex (a kind of mountain goat) that became extinct in 2000 due to overhunting and competiton from domestic goats and sheep. Humans caused their demise. Cloning them (as what scientists are doing) can help undo the mistake of the past. Here, cloning is a good idea, but only as a last resort.

On the other hand:

Take the T-Rex, a prehistoric creature that died out naturally 65 million years ago. Cloning a T-rex would be wrong, because the animal would end up in a zoo in an unnatural environment. For such a huge creature, it would be impossible to meet all its needs, mentally and emotionally.

You could clone your pet if you wanted to, but what would be the point?
It wouldn't extend your pet's lifespan in any way, because the clone isn't actually the same exact animal. The clone would not have your pet's personality, it would have a mind of its own. The only similarity is the DNA and the fact that it looks just like the original animal.

So, in conclusion, cloning is fine so long as it is used sparingly and relevantly and the act of doing so does not hurt or harm the clone.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:47 pm 
Beginner
Beginner

Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 67
I heard they brought my beloved thylacine back from extinction thru cloning too! :) watched it on the travel channell. thylacines are awesome.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:29 pm 
Famous one
Famous one
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 3:05 am
Posts: 1837
Location: England
Gender: Female
No. As much as I love my dog and my dad's dog it wouldn't be natural to clone them. People have to accept that their pet, or at least his soul, has moved on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:33 pm 
Advanced
Advanced
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 203
Location: michigan
Gender: Male
I would still miss the origional..

_________________
Silver is no silver colored wolf! nor a werewolf! they just call him that... But he is a Wolf!!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:18 pm 
Famous one
Famous one
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Hot Atlanta! A-Town Down
Gender: Male
Canis Lupus They are also tring to clone human organs so that transplants can happen faster. I have to agree that would be great for us. But a pet I wouldnt be interested I'd just have to move on with my life because it would be unhealthy to have that clone around.

_________________
Get Rich Quick! Simply set up a premium phone line. To find out more call 1-900- 478-8743

Is your memory letting you down? And what about your memory..is it letting you down? Call for an information pack quick before you forget


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:27 am 
Famous one
Famous one
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1086
Location: England
Gender: Female
Quote:
Hey i think i watched that too^^
thylacine's are awsome, hey maybe they should bring back th moa that was hunted to death by man
or the british wolf(lol dunno its real name) i hate this country because we hunted all our prescious wolves to extintion T.T


canis lupus lupus or European Wolves used to inhabit Britain. A charities called the UK Wolf Conservation Trust and Anglican Wolf Society are trying release wolves back into Britain.
It's sad that all the wolves in Britain were killed - poor St Edmund must rolling over in his grave.

Back on the topic of cloning, cloning human organs is a great idea, especially for those who desperately need a transplant.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:08 am 
Animation Source is my home!
Animation Source is my home!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 3452
Gender: Female
I think cloning in any way is wrong. From cloning a pet to cloning human oragans. It's just wrong. I would never EVER clone a pet. No matter what. Not only is nothing as good as the original, but cloning is just.. immoral. It's pretty much people playing God. And that's wrong. I don't care what people say.. Cloning is one of the worst things people have come up with. And I stand by that. You can try and change my mind all you want. I'm not going to.

_________________
Image
Avatar © Me - Sig © Mightybalto1925 | ? ?ø?????¥ ????? ???? ? ?? ?? ?? ?ø ?øø??
Peace | Love | Pit Bulls


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:16 am 
Animation Source is my home!
Animation Source is my home!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2313
Location: Maryland
Gender: Female
No. Just no.

I heard that scientists want to clone deceased pets and humans. But it doesn't work like that - the clone may look exactly like the original, but it wouldn't be the same. The only simularity between a clone and a host is that they have the same DNA. They act, think, and do things differently.

_________________
Image
^ click it, you know you want to 8D

I gave up everything sane a while ago.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:13 am 
Famous one
Famous one
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1070
Gender: Female
Now way. I would rather miss the pet I loved instead of making a clone. Copies are never the same as the original. they're just fake imatataions. It's better to just have the pet you loved instead of trying to replace it. (Im not going to get religiouse or anything but...) Even if you made a clone, I don't think your original pet would like that. They would feel replaced. (If you believe that when things die they go to heven or... you know. XD) Well I would never clone any of my deceased pets. I would rather try to bring them back then make a copy. ( Even though that is not possible... ) :wink:

_________________
married to silent wolf <3.

( i'm obsessed with call of duty(all of them), get over it :] Gaz's hat is what makes the world go round. )
avatar and signature by me :]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:49 pm 
Newcomer
Newcomer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 47
Gender: Female
I would make a clone because then I would have that dog FOREVER!!! wiggle.gif

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cloning Deceased Pets
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:51 pm 
Living here
Living here
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:00 pm
Posts: 999
Location: Koeyohte's Location: Ireland
fleabag wrote:
would you clone your deceased pets to produce a puppy identical to your old one? I first heard about this new business in Dog Fancy a long time ago I think it said it costs 16,000 dollars tho. But if it didn't cost that much...


The only thing you'll get frome a clone is a replica of your pet. They won't have the same brain... they won't recall anything that happened to your pet, this creature will just be a replica of it. Pretty much like taking another's mind and inserting it into another's body. I see no point in that.

_________________
Image

Rest in Peace Steve Irwin
!!AVATAR BY ATKARAYLOBO!!Thank you SO MUCH for this beautiful gift!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:59 am 
Advanced
Advanced
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:37 pm
Posts: 235
Location: In a room full of COOKIES!
Gender: Female



cloning animals is disgusting. it's not at all natural and if the animal or person was quite old when it was cloned, or something like that, then it would look young but really have the genes of however old what it was cloned from was when they got it.
no, no and definately NOT!!! i would never clone a pet (or family member) who is deceased because, as said before, it won't fill the place in your heart.

_________________
ImageClick here to feed me a Rare Candy!Get your own at Pokeplushies!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008 phpBB Group