Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:57 am Posts: 173
Gender: Female
Ah, so many sequals, so little time eh? Alright, time for whitey to put her two cents on the table. Well, the second Little Mermaid was actually pretty good, I enjoyed it, the second Cinderella, they could've done better. I just hope they don't start this like the Land Before Time when it's an endless amount of sequals, 7, 8,9, 10. I'm sick of so many sequals for good movies I say,"Which number are we on now? 4? 6?" The thrid Cinderella doesn't look as good as you would think it could be, I haven't heard anything on a third Little Mermaid though.
_________________ Two heads are definatly better than one.
I'm just saying that it looks good but not like really good. I want to give the 3rd cinderella a chance and see what it's all about. It's not like I'm going to run off and buy it the 1st day it comes out. Anyways I probably will never see it so. I don't really care what the TLM 3 is all about. I'll just probably ignore it when it comes out. I found something on youtube but it didn't really help to understand what's going on for that movie. So yeah...
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:34 pm Posts: 459 Location: In Gotham.
Gender: Female
No, I really don't think we need these 3rd movies. Cinderella 2....did it REALLY have a point? The Little Mermaid 2 was ok, but nothing special. I guess they're doin' 'em for money, though, I wonder how much they will get.
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:14 am Posts: 818 Location: Oz
Gender: Male
I think that they don't need a third, TV series are better
_________________ "There are all sorts of things that would be comforting. I expect an injection of morphine would be comforting... But to say that something is comforting is not to say that it's true". — Richard Dawkins
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum