Yes, I do know Balto was not buried at all, but as I said before, the poem wouldn't make much sense if I threw out that part.
I don't take this as a problem at all.

Then yes, you definitely should give credit where credit is due (as it appears you finally did). But as I inferred (and as anyone who knows the history of the real Balto knows), Balto was not buried in Nome, or anywhere for that matter, really.

Not trying to be a problem here. I'm just clarifying.

The composition is not mine,if you thought.I found it in my dog encyclopedia,and it was written by Lord Byron as a memorial to his dog Boatswain (I ough to put that in credits...).I agree,the first two verses aren't very fitting,but the rest of the poem wouldn't make sense without it so I decided to keep it.

A beautiful composition. Touching. But as to Balto's remains? Well, if that was what you meant by this image and the associated poem, it would be quite inaccurate. Just FYI.

Wow. That is really deep.