The creator choses the name. It shouldn't make all these issues. If she wanted to call a female character with a male name, she's free to do it, there is no rule that says that female character must only have female names xD a friend of mine is a girl yet her parents named her with a name that is used in the 99% of the cases for boys. But nobody complained, it was their choice. Same goes here xD
It may be weird but, if Artemisa liked this name, well, good for her we should respect her choices instead of complaing

The name IS a small matter for me. Illogical, yes. Small matter, definitely. My primary purpose with my earlier comment was to correct the error in identification you made (which is rather broader than varied spellings of one Jewish festival, incidentally).

I don't know if I have any place here, but I think it is really just up to the owner of the character. So what? I mean, they could love their character like a child, and yet people hate it because a female has a male name. I actually am guilty of doing this, with a she-wolf named Logan. Just putting my thought out there...

- L

I also cannot see the logic in naming a clearly female character after a male figure. Of course, the god in question was named "Ares", not "Aries", which I believe is more the spelling of the astrological symbol in the western zodiac...a ram (thus, male). No issues with the design otherwise as far as I can tell from a casual analysis...

Nice picture, but I can't help noting the incongruity that she's named after a Greco-Roman deity who was so masculine that his symbol is used for males to this day, yet this character is herself clearly female.

Sorry, ADHD moment there. Back on the artistic side of things, I think her markings make an interesting break from the usual dark-above, light-below pattern. Not sure about realism, but it looks good.

Beautiful!

Thank you

This is really good indeed.

Thanks

Love herrrr