It's not automatic, the mods have to choose them; I have already said
it. And, if the mods would care to READ the instructions I give, the
creations in the selection of the week are the first one of each
section (so you need to move up the creation you would like to display
here in every list)

Actually we can't, as the new system isn't finished yet, or so I last
heard. I just tried changing the fanart of the week on Saturday and
nothing happened. We'll just have to wait until Steet finishes the new
system I suppose. I don't know how the new one is going to work, if
it's automatic or manual.

A mod has to change it. And it seems none of the other mods are taking
that into consideration..

Are you really surprised by that? I've been railing on about the lack
of consistency (and fairness) of such features for months. And
usually all I get are excuses and hostile defenses from staff members
and their friends.

On top of it all, just as steet
replied in my criticism of the feature itself (while I also said it
was - in of itself - a wonderful new idea), it is not objective. It
is most definitely SUBjective. Meaning "unfair". Biased. I mean,
look who's on the list. Greykitty's been on there TWICE since the
feature started (only recently)...and she joined back up juuuuuuuust
before the feature started. Coincidence? Oh, sure.

Rotramel the Writer is fan fiction of the week. For about four
weeks now (though even before that, "fan fiction of the week" actually
being "fan fiction of the month or months" was nothing new).
Coincidence, given that he's in a relationship with one of the fan
fiction moderators? Oh, sure.

Even steet himself
being listed twice on that list? Not that he shouldn't have a chance
to be listed. But one has to admit...he announces the feature, says
IN that announcement that it will be subjective (as a feature), and
then is listed twice? In public office, in private clubs and
organizations, and on most websites, that'd be considered extremely
prejudicial (like a group leader giving himself awards and promotions
regardless of the views of the members). Hey - not saying steet
doesn't deserve it...but I think you get the idea.

This
feature has ended up the way most of them have on this site - biased
and poorly-managed. It's unfortunate, isn't it? (And now, we shall
hear from those who want to flame me because I spoke in less than
complimentary and appreciative terms about certain members, this
feature, and even the webmaster...which indicates just how they will
have missed the damned point.)