Alue26
I was surfing on the net and then I came on the quesion xhy are tghe films so short? I mean Balto for example, they have a length of 78 minutes.
catwhohas14tails
Well, it's kinda hard to sum up such a "simple" adventure in
the length of 2 hours (which has been the preferred
approximate time length for movies) Even in the first movie
they added stuff that never even happened in real life. If
they took out that stuff, then the movie would've only been
like a half hour, and there's really only so many adventures
a dog can have in an environment we're pretty much familiar
with (to sum it up nice and short, a snowy terrain) As for
the sequels, I think approximately 80 minutes is too long
for both of them XD Too much jargen and not enough action.
At least in my opinion.
| January 15, 2007 | ||
Well, it's kinda hard to sum up such a "simple" adventure in the length of 2 hours (which has been the preferred approximate time length for movies) Even in the first movie they added stuff that never even happened in real life. If they took out that stuff, then the movie would've only been like a half hour, and there's really only so many adventures a dog can have in an environment we're pretty much familiar with (to sum it up nice and short, a snowy terrain) As for the sequels, I think approximately 80 minutes is too long for both of them XD Too much jargen and not enough action. At least in my opinion. |
animated films are almost never longer than this. (around 80
minutes) This is different with the 3D animated films which
are longer, for some reasons.