blazetail
Just before I start the question I belive applys to all sources not just balto source
I was wondering if unrealistic characters are allowed I see so many of them all over the sources even on the sources where its ment to be realistic, when I say this I mean things like breed say a breed was set in 1800 but someone made a breed that was about only in 1900 is that allow or say a animal was being neutered but in the middle of it got up and ran off (still alive) is that allowed?
MightyBalto1925
The unrealistic characters are still allowed, but I think there may be some confusion about the rule. Seeing as how when a character is listed as unrealistic, it lists it like this: sparkledog/unrealistic. To me that only means the design. I could be wrong myself, but that's how I look at it.
| January 19, 2013 | ||
| ||
| Path of the Demon |
The unrealistic characters are still allowed, but I think there may be
some confusion about the rule. Seeing as how when a character is
listed as unrealistic, it lists it like this: sparkledog/unrealistic.
To me that only means the design. I could be wrong myself, but that's
how I look at it. |
Unrealistic characters AREN'T allowed, but "unrealistic" is generally defined as animals with extra appendages that they wouldn't realistically have (horns or antlers, wings, tentacles, extra limbs, extra eyes, extra HEADS, etc.), human clothing (including leg warmers, jewelry, pants, coats, hats, etc.), human appendages in place of their own (arms ending in hands, legs ending in feet, etc.). I also personally believe that "furry" stuff (animals with human stances, clothing and even human-like hands) are out. And ridiculous anyway.
But that scenario you talked about of a botched neutering? Yeah...too detailed. And too odd. And a bit excessive for this site to go into that sort of detail and that kind of situation. Steer clear please...so that we can all keep our lunches down. Thanks.