Nakou
Hey guys!
There is no attack on my question, I just would like to now why did you delete the characters of people who are here since more than 4 years? Why suddently we can't add imaginary characters (who are wolves with not naturel colors for example, or just with a different marking than your one)? Do you remember Jenna is red?
I have so much others questions but I don't remember.I think that the rules don't say that. Why did you change what STEET has create by the past?
Thanks to read this intelligently.
| November 19, 2010 | ||
| ||
| Senior Mod |
The so called unnatural colors you are trying to fight against that
are in the balto movies is what the creators used to represent the
breed colors in more of a cartoon way. The 'red' that jenna has, and
the purple-ish color of dixie. This isn't the place for this. As we
work out rules, don't rile things up here. |
| November 19, 2010 | ||
Fan chars mod | ||
| Grande Méchante Admin ~ |
http://www.animationsource.org/balto/en/chars/Seeker/3489.html Oh and can I know why an African Wild Dog is on Balto Source Site? Can he survived to Nome, 1925? Are you sure? I think he doesn't have to be here more than this one http://hecatehell.deviantart.com/gallery/4719568#/d2hwvvb |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
Fan chars mod | ||
| Grande Méchante Admin ~ |
http://www.animationsource.org/balto/en/chars/Dixie/159.html Oh yes, really realistic character... She's purple, do you see? We can be original, yes, but if we like collars or if we add a scarf to our wolf, it won't kill anyone. Steet never say anything against that. And for example : http://www.animationsource.org [...] tml&numart=588&deb=9&display=9 This picturne is okay, but the character has got a pullover and long hair... I don't think this is realistic but personaly I don't care that it's send and accept. I don't think you understand what we are saying. We don't say that we can't, we say that we don't want. And that it wasn't like that by the past. |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
| ||
| Chasseuse de voleurs |
Sora : Did you really think that red for a dog is natural ? great,
give me a dog's photo were it's red like Jenna!!! Give me and I'll
shut up. But sorry, did you really think this is unatural
http://hecatehell.deviantart.com/gallery/4719568#/d2hwvvb ( for a
animation movie, cause this is for children, not an documentary ) |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
| ||
| Team Rocket |
Soooo basically you're saying it's impossible to be creative with
natural colors or without accessories? Good to know. There are plenty of places to put up unnatural dogs (Deviantart, Storm-Artists, etc.) Balto Source rules say no unnatural dogs here because in the Balto universe, there is no purple husky or fire-patterned wolf. This isn't Original Character Source, this is Balto Source. Don't like it? Get a DA account. Steet's site, Steet's rules. That's all it comes down to. |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
| ||
| Find me on DA or FA (Links in profile) |
Everyone who reads the character rules should notice that it only
says: "Your character must be creative and unique" where does it say
that the character has to be realistic? And even UK´s "Fan-character guide" doesn´t say anything about realism. ( http://www.animationsource.org [...] -is-not-acceptable-t23398.html , you can also find it at the bottom of the character rules) A necklace doesn´t make a sparkledog. I think accessories should be allowed as long as not the whole character is covered with them (like "leg warmers" + necklaces + etc.) One accessory is enough and should be allowed. For me sparkledogs are characters with bright, eye burning colors (like bright blue + green, pink and such) Characters should be pleasing for the eyes, and a simple nechlace or greyish-blue (not bright blue!) markings doesn´t affect the one who looks at it to be hostile to it. (bright colors do, at least to me) Not to mention that Jenna Kodi and the other pups are sparkle-dogs too.... Why are they allowed? So creativity shouldn´t be banned from this site. Can anyone remember the time where the mods wheren´t that intolerant? The time we where ALLOWED to be creative? Even without these unwritten rules people created esthetic characters. Not everyone is a sparkle-fan. It´s good that characters should have a complete bio now. That´s a good rule But almost every other rule is unneccessary or intolerant. I think steet created this site for people to have fun and be creative and now the mods seem to take our creativity, crumble it up and burn it. And one thing: Every character created oin here is completely fictional, we made them up with our imagination, so there not only ONE "real" character on here. So what now? Deactivating and deleting ALL characters? Ban the "fan-character" section off this site? Well, mods, then you´ll have a lot of work, and caused a lot of people, who are the reason for this site to exsist, to leave. Is that neccessary? Look, we don´t ask for much, just give us our creativity back! |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
Fan chars mod | ||
| Grande Méchante Admin ~ |
Thanks for your answer MJW. People are leaving the site because it became unfair, and it's really sad because this site is amazing. I hope the problem will be settled soon. And more than originality, the english side of the site asked "real" characters... It's necessary to be more tolerant! |
![]() | November 18, 2010 | |
Agreed with you seems that rules has been changed to bad, now the site asks so much for originality but when you try to be that you are banned and calificated as "sparkle" |
| November 18, 2010 | ||
| ||
| Chasseuse de voleurs |
Yeah ! Here are the STEET rules, take a look on them !!! http://www.animationsource.org/balto/en/chars/&create=1&rules=1 |