Balto Source news
Character reminder

Written by Troll Berserker :



 

A lot of people here like making characters who are pups of Aleu and Niju, Kodi and Dusty etc. Those pairings are NOT canon. It is possible but it must be explained somehow how the two became mates/had pups (either with an explanation in the bio or link to a fanfiction). Non explained pairing kids will be seen as AU and will not be allowed.

You can ship whoever you want, but following the "DO NOT change the events that happened in an explicit way in the movies" as written in the rules, instead of writing "he's the son of Jenna and Kaltag" like it was something obvious, just include a short explanation like "Jenna broke up with Balto and became mates with Kaltag". That's perfectly enough.

The only official Balto pairings are Balto and Jenna, Boris and Stella and Ralph and Dusty (yes, it's canon and confirmed. Check the interviews with Balto 3 director).

 

I'd also like to remind you that character rules are more important than character tags. even if there is "not Balto related" tag, it is outdated and unrelated characters are not allowed anymore.




5325 visits

Comments

June 05, 2014
Global Moderator Usa Female
Rachel_The_Rebel ---> Let's not get carried away with the sarcastic number of litters, however, I do see your point, but I highly doubt someone could give BaltoXJenna 3,000,000 litters of pups. It's illogical.

And, yes, this does limit things as far as creativity goes, yet again.

Which begs the question, what's wrong with non canon pairings and offspring for that pairing? But would AU characters/pairings only be acceptable for fanfics? Why have them for fanfics outright, but not for fan character creation, even if such things are explained in the bios? Sure they don't happen in the movies, but the movies can only do so much.

That's why humans have imagination.

Guest
Guest
June 05, 2014
This is kind of ridiculous?

June 05, 2014
Usa
I think it sorta limits peoples creativity not being able to make pups of non-canon couples...prepare yourselves, the 3000000 litters of BaltoxJenna are coming.

June 05, 2014
Global Moderator Usa Female
The 'No breaking of Canon pairings' is rather excessive.

June 05, 2014
Usa Female
Senior Mod
I knew AU (alternate universe) characters aren't allowed (though I don't get the big idea over it), but I didn't even know about the no breaking of Canon pairings…That's news to me. That seems a bit much for me. :/

As for second, third etc litters, I think those are allowed if the relation is strong enough.

June 05, 2014
Usa Female
Let me be your everlasting light
urgh..I'm mostly agreeing with the comments below..This is getting really nitpicky now.

June 05, 2014
Usa Male
At this point, I'm just sort of confused. :(

Guest
Guest
June 04, 2014
Wow, now this is different, I had no idea and never saw this one coming. I agree with Brown Wolf, also Juuchan17 on this one.

June 04, 2014
Global Moderator Usa Female
I agree with what this news is saying, but I also agree with you as well, Juuchan. Seriously, can't there be just one long set of rules for characters and let that be the end of it?

Also, as Juuchan said, what about second litters?

Such treatment like this is understandable to an extent but it also hinders too.

What is allowed and what is not?

With this new information, you might wanna update the characters rules... Yet again.

This makes the, what, third, fourth time now...??

June 04, 2014
Usa Female
WQ > Balto > WoC
Personally, I feel that if the couple is not mentioned officially in the movie as a couple, then it is not canon, regardless of the director's words of God or what have you.

Also, I think that your new rules on such characters are now confused. If someone makes a character that's the child of [insert Balto character here] and [insert Balto character here] and it's not one of the canonial ships of the trilogy, I feel that it should be allowed as an AU sort of character.

Also, what about second litters? It's never stated that some characters had more pups, so shouldn't they be given the same harsh treatment as well?

Thanks for confusing and screwing with the fun of fandom couplings, you guys.

- Juuchan17

June 04, 2014
Usa Female
Wow! I didn't know until just now that those were not allowed. Won't be a problem for me. I never really cared for crack pairings.

1 2 3
Next

Next



Not connected : To be able to post a message site, you must be connected.

Register on the site!





Quick menu

Close
Fanart
Fanart
Images
Images
Fanfic
Fanfic
Musics
Musics
Videos
Videos
Gamebooks
Gamebooks
Projects
Projects
Contests
Contests
Characters
Characters
Ask Questions
Ask Questions
Articles
Articles
Reviews
Reviews
Treasure Planet
Treasure Planet
Regular Show
Regular Show
My Neighbor Totoro
My Neighbor Totoro
We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story
We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story
The Land Before Time
The Land Before Time
Avatar
Avatar
Steven Universe
Steven Universe
Bluey
Bluey
Scooby-Doo
Scooby-Doo
Balto
Balto
The Lion King
The Lion King
TaleSpin
TaleSpin
Spirit
Spirit
All Dogs Go To Heaven
All Dogs Go To Heaven
Princess & The Frog
Princess & The Frog
Brother Bear
Brother Bear
The Fox and the Hound
The Fox and the Hound
The Aristocats
The Aristocats
Oliver & Company
Oliver & Company
Lady & The Tramp
Lady & The Tramp
Robin Hood
Robin Hood
Cats Don't Dance
Cats Don't Dance
Gummi Bears
Gummi Bears
Bambi
Bambi
Mulan
Mulan
Anastasia
Anastasia
Rio
Rio
Jungle Book
Jungle Book
How To Train Your Dragon
How To Train Your Dragon
101 Dalmatians
101 Dalmatians
Tangled
Tangled
Watership Down
Watership Down
Frozen
Frozen
My Little Pony
My Little Pony
The Secret of Nimh
The Secret of Nimh
Gravity Falls
Gravity Falls
Ice Age
Ice Age
Ginga
Ginga
Despicable Me
Despicable Me
Bolt
Bolt
Zootopia
Zootopia
Over the Hedge
Over the Hedge
Beauty & The Beast
Beauty & The Beast

All sites and forums in the archive

Français   English

RSS      Bookmark the site      Privacy policy      1 visitor connected

Generated in 0.334 seconds